Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887506›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

CXR-MultiTaskNet a unified deep learning framework for joint disease localization and classification in chest radiographs.

K Divya Reddy, Anitha Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K Divya ReddyResearch Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Aziz Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500075, India. divya.kotla@outlook.com.
Anitha PatilDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Aziz Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500075, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest X-ray (CXR) is a challenging problem in automated medical diagnosis, where complex visual patterns of thoracic diseases must be precisely identified through multi-label classification and lesion localization. Current approaches typically consider classification and localization in isolation, resulting in a piecemeal system that does not exploit common representations and is often not clinically interpretable, as well as limited in handling multi-label diseases. Although multi-task learning frameworks, such as DeepChest and CLN, appear to meet this goal, they suffer from task interference and poor explainability, which limits their practical application in real-world clinical workflows. To address these limitations, we present a unified multi-task deep learning framework, CXR-MultiTaskNet, for simultaneously classifying thoracic diseases and localizing lesions in chest X-rays. Our framework comprises a standard ResNet50 feature extractor, two task-specific heads for multi-task learning, and a Grad-CAM-based explainability module that provides accurate predictions and enhances clinical explainability. We formulate a joint loss that weighs the relative importance of representation extraction, which is large due to class variations, and the final loss, which is larger in the detection loss that occurs in extreme class imbalances between days and the detectability of varying disease manifestation types. Recent advances made by deep learning methods in the identification of disease in chest X-ray images are promising; however, there are limitations in their performance for complete analysis due to the lack of interpretability, some inherent weaknesses of convolutional neural networks (CNN), and prior learning of classification at the image level before localization of the disease. In this paper, we propose a dual-attention-based hierarchical feature extraction approach, which addresses the challenges of deep learning in detecting diseases in chest X-ray images. Through the use of visual attention maps, the detection steps can be better tracked, and therefore, the entire process is made more interpretable than with a traditional CNN-embedding model. We also manage to obtain both disease-level and pixel-level predictions, which enable explainable and comprehensive analysis of each image and aid in localizing each detected abnormality area. The proposed approach was further optimized for X-ray images by computing the objective losses during training, which ultimately gives higher significance to smaller lesions. Experimental evaluations on a benchmark chest X-ray dataset demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach achieving a macro F1-score of 0.965 (0.968 micro F1-score) for disease classification and mean IoU of 0.851 (mAP@0.50) for localization of diseases Content: Model intepretability, Chest X-ray image disease detection, Detection region localization, Weakly supervised transfer learning Lesion localization → 5 of 0.927 Compared to state-of-the-art single-task and multi-task baselines, these results are consistently better. The presented framework provides an integrated, method-based approach to chest X-ray analysis that is clinically useful, interpretable, and scalable for automation, allowing for efficient diagnostic pathways and enhanced clinical decision-making. This single framework can serve as a router for next-gen explainable AI in radiology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerChest X-ray analysisDisease classificationExplainable deep learningLesion localizationMulti-task learning

Identifiers

PMID40887506
PMCPMC12399747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.