ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025
Dobutamine administration: a proposal for a standardized approach.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to Dobutamine in Septic Shock With Myocardial Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Hidden effects of dobutamine on cardiac output.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dobutamine is the most commonly used inotropic agent in critically ill patients with impaired cardiac contractility. However, its benefit-risk profile remains debated, and clear, structured guidance for its use is lacking. This hypothesis proposes a pragmatic framework for dobutamine administration to promote rational and consistent clinical and experimental practice. The aim is to propose a rational and reproducible use of inotropic therapy with dobutamine in both clinical and experimental settings in cases of shock with low cardiac output, particularly cardiogenic shock, septic shock with septic cardiomyopathy, and low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery (LCOS). Dobutamine should be prescribed only in the presence of acute circulatory failure with signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and impaired cardiac contractility. A low cardiac index (CI) alone does not mandate inotrope initiation. Echocardiography is essential for initial assessment but should be complemented by continuous cardiac output monitoring for evaluating dose-response. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 μg/kg*min, with stepwise titration based on CI and perfusion markers reassessed every 20 min. A significant CI increase and resolution of hypoperfusion should guide further escalation. Persistent hypoperfusion despite CI improvement may indicate inadequate response and justify cautious dose increases, while continued hypoperfusion with further CI rise suggests a flow-independent deficit, discouraging further titration. Dobutamine should be used with clear indications, guided by a standardized approach integrating continuous hemodynamic and perfusion monitoring. This strategy may help optimize therapeutic benefit while minimizing unnecessary exposure and adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.