Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887491›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025

Dobutamine administration: a proposal for a standardized approach.

Lorenzo Calabró, Filippo Annoni, Fabio Silvio Taccone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hidden effects of dobutamine on cardiac output.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorenzo CalabróDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. l.calabro@hubruxelles.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-5344
Filippo AnnoniDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dobutamine is the most commonly used inotropic agent in critically ill patients with impaired cardiac contractility. However, its benefit-risk profile remains debated, and clear, structured guidance for its use is lacking. This hypothesis proposes a pragmatic framework for dobutamine administration to promote rational and consistent clinical and experimental practice. The aim is to propose a rational and reproducible use of inotropic therapy with dobutamine in both clinical and experimental settings in cases of shock with low cardiac output, particularly cardiogenic shock, septic shock with septic cardiomyopathy, and low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery (LCOS). Dobutamine should be prescribed only in the presence of acute circulatory failure with signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and impaired cardiac contractility. A low cardiac index (CI) alone does not mandate inotrope initiation. Echocardiography is essential for initial assessment but should be complemented by continuous cardiac output monitoring for evaluating dose-response. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 μg/kg*min, with stepwise titration based on CI and perfusion markers reassessed every 20 min. A significant CI increase and resolution of hypoperfusion should guide further escalation. Persistent hypoperfusion despite CI improvement may indicate inadequate response and justify cautious dose increases, while continued hypoperfusion with further CI rise suggests a flow-independent deficit, discouraging further titration. Dobutamine should be used with clear indications, guided by a standardized approach integrating continuous hemodynamic and perfusion monitoring. This strategy may help optimize therapeutic benefit while minimizing unnecessary exposure and adverse effects.

Indexed as

Cardiac outputDobutamineHemodynamic monitoringOrgan dysfunctionShockTissue perfusion

Identifiers

PMID40887491
PMCPMC12399504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.