ArticleScientific reports2025
Noncontrast CT-based deep learning for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage expansion incorporating growth of intraventricular hemorrhage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in neuroradiology: Recent developments and applications.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Letter to the Editor: Traditional medical image interpretation and deep learning-based image analysis in predicting risk in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Non-Contrast Brain Computed Tomography Scan for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging studies for predicting hematoma expansion: from traditional imaging signs to artificial intelligence-based multimodal fusion.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with high mortality and disability, where early hematoma expansion (HE) critically influences prognosis. Previous studies suggest that revised hematoma expansion (rHE), defined to include intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) growth, provides improved prognostic accuracy. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a deep learning model based on noncontrast CT (NCCT) to predict high-risk rHE in ICH patients, enabling timely intervention. A retrospective dataset of 775 spontaneous ICH patients with baseline and follow-up CT scans was collected from two centers and split into training (n = 389), internal-testing (n = 167), and external-testing (n = 219) cohorts. 2D/3D convolutional neural network (CNN) models based on ResNet-101, ResNet-152, DenseNet-121, and DenseNet-201 were separately developed using baseline NCCT images, and the activation areas of the optimal deep learning model were visualized using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). Two baseline logistic regression clinical models based on the BRAIN score and independent clinical-radiologic predictors were also developed, along with combined-logistic and combined-SVM models incorporating handcrafted radiomics features and clinical-radiologic factors. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The 2D-ResNet-101 model outperformed others, with an AUC of 0.777 (95%CI, 0.716-0.830) in the external-testing set, surpassing the baseline clinical-radiologic model and the BRAIN score (AUC increase of 0.087, p = 0.022; 0.119, p = 0.003). Compared to the combined-logistic and combined-SVM models, AUC increased by 0.083 (p = 0.029) and 0.074 (p < 0.058), respectively. The deep learning model can identify ICH patients with high-risk rHE with favorable predictive performance than traditional baseline models based on clinical-radiologic variables and radiomics features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.