ArticleScientific reports2025
Source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments of Dongping lake based on PCA-PMF model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline assessment of sedimentary heavy metals and ecological risks in the high-siltation Gorai River, Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Groundwater Around Typical Karst Region of the Lower Yellow River, China.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Geospatial mapping, risk assessment and multivariate analysis of naturally occurring radionuclides and potentially toxic elements in agrarian soils of SAS Nagar, Punjab, India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Study on tensile properties of Hippophae rhamnoides roots and prediction model of chemical composition in tailing areas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately characterizing the spatial distribution of heavy metals in lake surface sediments, analyzing their sources, and identifying potential ecological risks are important scientific supports for lake ecosystem management. This study selected Dongping Lake, a typical inland shallow lake in the eastern region, as the research object. It systematically analyzed the distribution characteristics, source identification, and ecological risks of eight heavy metals (As, Zn, Cu, Ni, Cd, Hg, Pb, and Cr) in the sediments of Dongping Lake by employing a combination of statistical analysis, cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and positive matrix factorization (PMF) models, along with the enrichment factor method, geoaccumulation index method, and potential ecological risk assessment method. The results show that the concentrations of the eight heavy metals (As, Zn, Cu, Ni, Cd, Hg, Pb, and Cr) in the study area exhibit an overall improving trend, with significant spatial heterogeneity, and relatively higher concentrations in the central and southern regions. Through multivariate statistical analysis, three major sources of metal accumulation were identified: industrial and agricultural activities (As, Cu, Hg, Cd), traffic emissions (Zn, Ni, Pb), and natural geological background (Cr). Enrichment characteristics showed that Cd, As, and Hg were moderately to heavily enriched, and the potential ecological risk index (RI) indicated that Hg and Cd are the main risk factors, with contribution rates of 41.83% and 37.77%, respectively. The study revealed the dominant role of human activities in the accumulation of heavy metals in the sediments of Dongping Lake, providing a scientific basis for precise pollution control and ecological restoration in the watershed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.