Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887125›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Pandemic planning for primary care in Southwestern Ontario: protocol for a sequential multiple-methods design.

Maria Mathews, Dana Ryan, Leslie Meredith, Daniel Grushka, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Gillian Young, Eric K W Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada maria.mathews@schulich.uwo.ca.
Dana RyanDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-8849
Leslie MeredithDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel GrushkaDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Julia LukewichFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Gillian YoungDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Eric K W WongDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care providers rapidly adapted their practice in response to emerging knowledge of infection risk, resource availability and evolving patient and system needs. Given the previous lack of guidance specific to primary care settings, there is a need to formalise and integrate lessons learnt from these successful adaptations into future pandemic plans. Our project will develop a model for pandemic planning in primary care designed for replication in other Canadian regions and internationally to facilitate the scale and spread of effective primary care pandemic response strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will apply a pragmatic approach and a sequential multiple-methods design consisting of three objectives: (1) scoping review, (2) priority setting exercise and (3) plan creation. For objective 1, we will conduct a scoping review to identify the essential supports of a pandemic response plan for primary care at the clinic, community, regional and provincial levels in Canada and comparable countries. We will conduct the review in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology (search date July 2025) and synthesise findings based on recurring themes. For objective 2, we will engage primary care providers, public health professionals and health system managers in a priority-setting exercise consisting of deliberative dialogues and a Delphi process. The exercise will involve a presentation and three rounds of online surveys asking participants to rank the importance of various pandemic supports for primary care. We estimate that 100 participants will attend the presentations and 60 will complete all three rounds of the survey. For objective 3, we will co-create clinic-level, community-level and region-level pandemic response plans in Southwestern Ontario through working groups led by primary care providers and public health members of the research team, with an aim to engage approximately 12-24 participants. We will use rapid reviews, stakeholder input and evidence gathered in earlier components of the project to operationalise prioritised supports. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained ethics approval from the Western University Research Ethics Board (project ID: 127132) and will use best practices for promoting consent, confidentiality and data security. We will disseminate findings through regional, national and international conferences, peer-reviewed journal publications and online platforms. Lastly, we will develop and share a toolkit for pandemic planning in primary care to encourage further research and inform future pandemic preparedness efforts.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsPrimary Health CareHealth PlanningHumansOntarioResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Delphi TechniqueDisease OutbreaksGeneral PracticeHealth policyPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID40887125
PMCPMC12406867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.