Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887119›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Validation of the Functional Activity Scoring Tool (FAST): a novel pictorial scale for assessing function in patients with knee osteoarthritis in primary care.

Zhi Yin Tang, Khim Siong Ng, Jia Xing Tee, Elizabeth Zhao En Lee, Muhamad Haziq Bin Bistamam, Jocelyn Su-Lyn Wong, Yi Ling Eileen Koh, Meredith Yeung

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05590663 (Functional Activity Scoring Tool), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05590663 completednot on this map

Functional Activity Scoring Tool (FAST) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS): Assessment and Validation of Two Functional Scales in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) in Singapore

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2023 to 2023Enrolled150ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsPhysiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhi Yin TangDepartment of Physiotherapy, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore tang.zhi.yin@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-8146
Khim Siong NgDepartment of Physiotherapy, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0374-326X
Jia Xing TeeHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Elizabeth Zhao En LeeHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Muhamad Haziq Bin BistamamHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Jocelyn Su-Lyn WongHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Yi Ling Eileen KohSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Meredith YeungHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-4187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for assessing functional ability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, existing PROMs have limitations, particularly for individuals with low literacy or non-native English speakers. The Functional Activity Scoring Tool (FAST) was developed as a pictorial-based PROM to address these issues. This study evaluated the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the FAST compared with the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

designA multicentre prospective cohort study.

settingThis study occurred from December 2022 to December 2023 across four public outpatient physiotherapy clinics in Singapore.

participantsData collection was performed on individuals who were clinically diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Variables were collected during baseline and follow-up assessments using FAST, PSFS, KOOS and the Global Rating of Change Score. Participants were asked to specify their preferred outcome measure. Validity was assessed via concurrent validity, construct validity through principal component analysis and content validity. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) established the test-retest reliability, while responsiveness was evaluated based on changes in PROM scores.

results107 participants, aged 66.7±7.7 years, were recruited for data analysis. The FAST showed strong construct and content validity, excellent concurrent validity with the PSFS (Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ)=0.87-0.90, p<0.001) and moderate to strong validity with the KOOS. The FAST demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.67, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.81). The correlation between change scores on the FAST and PSFS in the stable, improved and worsened groups was r=0.69, 0.84 and 0.70, respectively. The FAST was preferred by 69% of participants.

conclusionThe FAST is a valid, reliable, responsive and preferred PROM for assessing functional ability in knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05590663.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSingaporeKneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40887119
PMCPMC12406902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.