ArticleBMJ open2025
Realist evaluation of factors affecting the retention of the mental health workforce: building a realist programme theory.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe shortage of mental healthcare workforce is a global problem. Mental health services have higher staff turnover and more vacancies than the health sector average. In this study, we developed, tested and refined an initial programme theory (IPT) to offer insight into mechanisms that affect staff retention in UK mental health provider organisations.
designA realist evaluation to identify the contexts and mechanisms that impacted on workforce retention. We developed an IPT through a realist review and stakeholder engagement.
settingWe then tested the IPT through a realist evaluation in six case studies in selected National Health Service (NHS) mental health Trusts in England. Sites were selected to give variation in retention rates; quality ratings were awarded by the national healthcare regulator, staff satisfaction levels and geography.
participantsRealist interviews (199) were conducted with senior executives and registered mental health clinicians. Data were analysed using an iterative realist approach to analyse the links between the context, mechanism and outcomes and test and revise initial programme theories. The study has been reported in line with Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) II guidelines.
resultsData allowed us to refine the IPT. Workplace contexts influenced the key mechanisms of 'perceived quality of care and the ability to make a difference', 'psychological safety', 'feeling valued' and 'feeling connected', all of which influenced intention to leave.
conclusionsThe final programme theory highlighting key contexts and mechanisms for improving retention among mental health staff in the NHS is presented. Organisational culture underlies all other contexts and mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.