ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
A continuum model for tissues with moderate cell density.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells sense mechanical stimuli to guide tissue growth and remodeling, a process called mechanotransduction, but it has still been challenging to model how forces affect cells in tissues with medium cell density. Common models like rule of mixtures (ROM) work well for cell dense tissues, and Eshelby's inclusion model fits cell sparse ones, but neither handles the in-between densities accurately. This study looks at how cell density, shape, and material properties affect stress in these tissues and suggests a better way to model them. We used finite element modeling (FEM) to test a bank of tissue samples, modeled as representative volume elements (RVEs), stretched uniaxially. We changed cell shapes (spherical, ellipsoidal, cylindrical), volume fraction, percolation, and stiffness ratio compared to the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). ROM could not estimate cell stress accurately when cells were sparse within the tissue, and Eshelby struggled as cells population got denser. Furthermore, we introduced a hybrid model that mixes both ideas, adjusting stress with a factor based on cell volume density. It matched FEM results much better across all cases and even worked for complex nonlinear materials using a simpler stiffness measure. This model improves our understanding of cell stress in diseased tissues like cerebral aneurysms, where cell density is not dense or sparse. It is a step toward understanding tissue mechanics better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.