ArticleOral oncology2025
Management of HPV+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with unknown primary in the era of treatment de-escalation.
Article in Oral oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer of unknown primary in the neck-challenging in diagnosis and treatment.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManagement of HPV+ HNSCC with unknown primary (SCCUP) remains controversial. A transoral surgery (TOS) for SCCUP with concurrent neck dissection (ND) has excellent rates of primary lesion detection and removal. This approach allows pathologic staging, directed adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), reduced radiation doses, and decreased rates of chemotherapy. De-escalation trials have largely excluded patients with SCCUP.
methodsSingle-center retrospective cohort analysis of patients with p16+ SCCUP between July 2012 and December 2021. Only patients without evidence of a primary tumor on physical or PET-CT exams were included. Kaplan-Meier estimates were computed for both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients treated with standard of care versus on-trial. Details of demographics, tumor staging, treatment modalities, recurrence, and rates of gastrostomy tube placement were also analyzed.
results66 patients were included, with 13 patients treated on a de-escalation trial. The primary lesion was detected in 57 patients (86.4%). 5-year OS for the on-trial and standard-of-care groups were 100% and 94.7%, respectively, and 5-year DFS estimates were 100% and 92.8%. Patients treated on-trial had lower radiation doses to the ipsilateral pharyngeal constrictor, ipsilateral salivary glands, oral cavity, and mandible.
conclusionPatients with HPV+ SCCUP treated with TOS and risk-directed adjuvant therapy have excellent OS and DFS, including patients enrolled in de-escalation trials. The majority of primary lesions are found intra-operatively with adequate margin clearance, allowing these patients to be treated similar to other early-stage HPV+ SCC patients. Patients on de-escalation trials received less radiation to organs at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.