Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40886278›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Circular RNAs in Blood and Its Clinical Relevance.

Farinaz Jafari Ghods

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Farinaz Jafari GhodsKoç University Hospital, Koç University Research Center Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have garnered considerable attention in recent years as potential biomarkers for liquid biopsies due to their unique characteristics offering unique advantages over linear RNAs. The significance of circRNAs, highlighting their stability, abundant expression, noninvasiveness, and cell/tissue specificity, makes circRNAs appealing candidates for liquid biopsies, facilitating real-time disease monitoring and guiding treatment decisions. Advancements in high-throughput RNA sequencing and experimental technologies have facilitated extensive identification and characterization of blood circRNAs (cell-free circRNAs and circRNAs in blood cells), revealing their roles in various human diseases. This chapter delves into the diverse roles of blood circRNAs across a spectrum of human diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune disorders, neurological conditions, and pregnancy-related complications and shedding light on their cellular functions and regulatory mechanisms. It worth mentioning that individual circRNAs may sometimes lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, necessitating the use of combinations for enhanced diagnostic value. Overall, it can be concluded that blood circRNAs hold immense promise as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in various human diseases. However, continued research efforts are needed to elucidate their full potential, optimize detection methods, and develop standardized diagnostic assays. By leveraging the unique properties of circRNAs, liquid biopsy approaches can revolutionize disease management, improve patient care, and ultimately enhance clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesBiomarkers, TumorCardiovascular DiseasesNeoplasmsNervous System DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsRNA, CircularBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsClinical RelevanceFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyPregnancyBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsRNA, CircularBloodCircular RNALiquid biopsyNoninvasive sampling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.