ArticleHuman genetics2025
BRCA-CN: a blockchain-based framework to support public variant databases sharing in multi-center community for diagnostic reference and China regulatory science.
Article in Human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blockchain for Digital Health Governance: Evidence Gap Map and Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Global Genomic Resources: A Narrative Review of Implications for Precision Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-quality, regulatory-grade databases for precise genetic variant interpretation are critically needed for Chinese populations, where existing fragmented databases impede clinical effectiveness evaluations. We developed BRCA-CN, a consortium blockchain-based governance framework specifically designed for BRCA gene variant interpretation in Chinese populations. Our framework compiled 66,485 variants from 6,031 samples across six Chinese laboratories. A 15-expert panel conducted systematic variant curation using unified interpretation standards based on ACMG/AMP guidelines. Smart contracts ensured data integrity and accountability throughout the consensus process. After deduplication, we established a comprehensive database of 950 unique variants (BRCA1: 365, BRCA2: 585), completing consensus reviews for 607 sites with 462 achieving definitive interpretations. Comparison with ClinVar revealed 83.6% concordance, with AI validation (PrimateAI, REVEL, EVE) confirming high interpretation accuracy. The blockchain framework successfully enabled secure cross-institutional collaboration while maintaining data sovereignty and regulatory compliance. BRCA-CN demonstrates the transformative potential of blockchain technology in genomic medicine, addressing critical challenges in data sharing, standardization, and regulatory oversight. This framework provides a robust foundation for clinical decision-making and establishes a replicable model for population-specific genomic databases. Access to the BRCA-CN portal, user guides, and test data is provided in the supplementary materials, available at: https://oxygen-chamber.mgi-tech.com/sdb2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40886259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.