Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40886251›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robotic surgery research from Pakistan: a concerningly low academic footprint.

Waseem Hassan, Mahad Auarangzeb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Waseem HassanInstitute of Chemical Sciences, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, 25120, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. waseem_anw@yahoo.com.
Mahad AuarangzebAitchson College, Shahrah-E-Quaid-E-Azam, Lahore, 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the scholarly research output of Pakistan in the field of robotic surgery, using publication trends and citation performance as indicators of research progress. In July 2025, data were retrieved from the Scopus database, focusing on articles and reviews. Two approaches were used: (1) a broad string-based search for robotic surgery-related literature and (2) a journal-specific search in five robotic surgery-focused journals (Journal of Robotic Surgery, International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Robotica, Science Robotics, and Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery). Publications were analyzed by collaboration type (with and without international collaboration). Using the broad search, 49,329 global publications were identified, with 93 collaborative (0.188%) and 45 non-collaborative (0.09%) publications from Pakistan. In the journal-specific search, 6340 global publications were identified, including 16 collaborative (0.25%) and 6 non-collaborative (0.09%) publications from Pakistan. Collaborative outputs were concentrated in the Journal of Robotic Surgery (10 articles) and Robotica (3 articles). Publication activity increased notably in recent years, with the highest number recorded in 2024 (36 publications) for the broad search and 2025 (5 publications) for the journal-specific search. Pakistan's contribution to robotic surgery research remains limited, with a small number of institutions driving collaborative output. Systematic strategies to enhance national research capacity in this field are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchRobotic Surgical ProceduresBibliometricsHumansPakistanNumerical dataRobotic surgeryScholarly outputScopus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.