Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40886227›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2025

Brexpiprazole for the Treatment of Agitation in Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review, Bayesian Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.

Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Ocilio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Mariana Lee Han, Paweł Łajczak, Mariana Letícia de Bastos Maximiano, Henrique Cal, Eryvelton de Souza Franco and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anderson Matheus Pereira da SilvaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. anderson.mhps@icloud.com.ORCID 0009-0003-4789-6019
Luciano FalcãoDepartment of Medicine, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Ocilio Ribeiro GonçalvesDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Filipe Virgilio RibeiroDepartment of Medicine, Barão de Mauá University Center, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Pedro Lucas Machado MagalhãesDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Medical Education, Angra dos Reis, RJ, Brazil.
Mariana Lee HanDepartment of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paweł ŁajczakDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Mariana Letícia de Bastos MaximianoDepartment of Medicine, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Henrique CalDepartment of Neurology, Centro de Cognição Paulista (CECOP), Santa Casa of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eryvelton de Souza FrancoCenter for Medical Sciences, Graduate Program in Translational Health, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Maria Bernadete de Sousa MaiaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgitation is a common and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in Alzheimer's disease (AD), affecting up to half of patients and contributing to faster cognitive decline and caregiver burden. Brexpiprazole, a serotonin-dopamine modulator, has been evaluated for this indication, but uncertainties remain regarding its efficacy, safety, and appropriate use in older adults.

objectiveWe aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation in older adults with AD through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook, we included RCTs comparing brexpiprazole (0.5-3 mg/day) with placebo in older adults with a clinical diagnosis of AD. Primary outcomes were agitation severity (measured using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI]), clinical impression (clinical global impression-severity scale [CGI-S]), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]), and adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using frequentist and Bayesian models in R (version 4.3.0).

resultsA total of five RCTs (N = 1770) met the inclusion criteria. Brexpiprazole was associated with a modest reduction in agitation CMAI (MD - 5.79; 95% CI - 9.55 to - 2.04; prediction interval: - 14.07 to 2.49) and improved CGI-S scores (MD - 0.23; 95% CI - 0.32 to - 0.13; prediction interval: - 0.39 to - 0.06). No significant differences were found in NPI scores. Adverse events such as extrapyramidal symptoms and daytime somnolence occurred more frequently with brexpiprazole but with wide and nonsignificant intervals. Meta-regression did not identify dose or duration as effect modifiers.

conclusionsBrexpiprazole may offer modest short-term benefits for agitation in AD without cognitive worsening, but safety signals remain imprecise. However, prediction intervals indicate considerable uncertainty, and its use should be individualized and closely monitored. Future trials should prioritize long-term outcomes and patient-centered measures. REGISTRATION PROSPERO PROTOCOL NUMBER: CRD 42025646060.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePsychomotor AgitationQuinolonesThiophenesAgedBayes TheoremHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicbrexpiprazoleQuinolonesThiophenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.