Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Phenotypic heterogeneity in adenomyosis: internal and external subtypes.
Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtype-specific analysis of factors associated with assisted reproductive technology indication and live birth in patients with adenomyosis: a retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Clinical challenges and therapeutic strategies in women with endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, and/or adenomyosis undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: a narrative review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate and compare the clinical characteristics and risk factors between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis (AM), as well as the differences in their perioperative management and findings in the two subtypes.
methodsThis observational study included women who were diagnosed with either intrinsic or extrinsic AM based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and who underwent a hysterectomy with a subsequent pathological examination. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, treatment outcomes and associated factors were evaluated.
results77 patients were classified in the intrinsic group and 54 in the extrinsic group. The results show that gravidity (P < 0.001), parity (P < 0.001), abortion (P < 0.001) and endometrial curettage (P = 0.017) were significantly higher in the intrinsic group, while the education level was lower in the intrinsic group (P = 0.012). Women in the extrinsic group had an earlier age of menarche (P = 0.026) and more commonly associated ovarian endometrioma (OMA) (P < 0.001) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) (P < 0.001). Dysmenorrhea was more severe in the extrinsic group (P = 0.009), whereas women in the intrinsic group had heavier menstrual blood loss (P < 0.001). Surgery time (P < 0.001), operative blood loss (P < 0.001), hospitalization cost (P < 0.001), and the intensity of postoperative medical treatment (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the extrinsic group. Multivariate analysis showed that lower education level, higher gravidity and more endometrial curettage were significantly associated with intrinsic AM. OMA and DIE were more commonly associated to extrinsic AM.
conclusionThese results suggest that intrinsic and extrinsic AM exhibit specific clinical profiles, perioperative characteristics and associated risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.