ArticleCancer2025
Optimizing treatment for platinum-resistant ovarian clear cell carcinoma: Efficacy of gemcitabine and combination therapy with bevacizumab.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell analysis identifies a tumor-specific T-cell metabolic signature: prognostic model and association with immunosuppressive microenvironment in ovarian cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlatinum-resistant (PR) ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is highly resistant to chemotherapy and has a poor prognosis. Both in-vitro and clinical studies have suggested that gemcitabine (GEM) is particularly effective against OCCC. Moreover, a combination with bevacizumab (Bev) is expected to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy.
methodsTo clarify these effects, the authors conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 130 patients who received treatment single-agent chemotherapy, with or without Bev, for PR-OCCC. The effects of loss of AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) protein expression also were assessed.
resultsPatients who received GEM as their first regimen achieved better overall survival (OS) than those who received other agents (median OS, 15.2 vs. 11.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.96; p = .032). Bev combination therapies demonstrated a significantly improved time to treatment failure compared with chemotherapy alone (6.6 vs. 2.7 months; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.87; p = .009) and showed a trend toward longer OS (23.3 vs. 9.8 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.05; p = .085). ARID1A status did not affect OS in the overall group or in the group that received GEM as the first-line regimen (p = .41 and p = .31, respectively).
conclusionsCollectively, the current findings suggest that GEM, particularly as a first-line treatment, may improve the prognosis of patients with PR-OCCC. Moreover, Bev combination therapy is a promising option for treating PR-OCCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.