ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock and mechanical circulatory support.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Throughout Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Meta-Analysis of Cohorts.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Mechanical Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: What Have We Learned from Trials?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Defining a national standard for ECMO emergency care.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- What's new in heart failure? November 2025.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsMortality for cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. To improve outcomes, centralization of treatment in specialized centres, especially those with expertise in mechanical circulatory support (MCS), has been recommended. High-volume centres may be able to provide standardized, better care. We analysed associations between centre volume and outcomes in Germany, a large country with multiple types of CS centres. METHODS AND
resultsBased on data from all CS patients treated in Germany from 2017-2021, the association between annual CS/MCS hospital volume and in-hospital mortality was assessed using adjusted Cox-regression, and spline plots were used to assess case thresholds. Overall, 220 223 CS patients underwent treatment at 1232 hospitals; 435/1232 (35%) of these performed MCS therapy, although only few hospitals (60/435, 14%) performed >25 MCS cases per year on average. Treatment at hospitals with a higher annual volume of CS and MCS cases was associated with a significantly lower mortality risk as compared to hospitals with a lower volume (upper third vs. lower two-thirds; CS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.94; p < 0.001; MCS: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.84; p < 0.001). These associations were continuous without a detectable ceiling effect, with spline plots suggesting case thresholds of at least 90 CS cases/25 MCS cases per year.
conclusionsCare for patients with CS treated with and without MCS is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in hospitals that manage high volumes of CS and MCS. This analysis indicates that centralization of CS care in specialized centres treating high volumes of patients with CS and MCS might improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.