Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40886086›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025

Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock and mechanical circulatory support.

Angela Dettling, Caroline Kellner, Jonas Sundermeyer, Benedikt N Beer, Lisa Besch, Marvin Kriz, Stefan Kluge, Paulus Kirchhof, Stefan Blankenberg, Benedikt Schrage

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. What's new in heart failure? November 2025.European journal of heart failure · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angela DettlingDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Caroline KellnerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jonas SundermeyerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Benedikt N BeerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lisa BeschDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marvin KrizDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Paulus KirchhofDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan BlankenbergDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Benedikt SchrageDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMortality for cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. To improve outcomes, centralization of treatment in specialized centres, especially those with expertise in mechanical circulatory support (MCS), has been recommended. High-volume centres may be able to provide standardized, better care. We analysed associations between centre volume and outcomes in Germany, a large country with multiple types of CS centres. METHODS AND

resultsBased on data from all CS patients treated in Germany from 2017-2021, the association between annual CS/MCS hospital volume and in-hospital mortality was assessed using adjusted Cox-regression, and spline plots were used to assess case thresholds. Overall, 220 223 CS patients underwent treatment at 1232 hospitals; 435/1232 (35%) of these performed MCS therapy, although only few hospitals (60/435, 14%) performed >25 MCS cases per year on average. Treatment at hospitals with a higher annual volume of CS and MCS cases was associated with a significantly lower mortality risk as compared to hospitals with a lower volume (upper third vs. lower two-thirds; CS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.94; p < 0.001; MCS: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.84; p < 0.001). These associations were continuous without a detectable ceiling effect, with spline plots suggesting case thresholds of at least 90 CS cases/25 MCS cases per year.

conclusionsCare for patients with CS treated with and without MCS is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in hospitals that manage high volumes of CS and MCS. This analysis indicates that centralization of CS care in specialized centres treating high volumes of patients with CS and MCS might improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHospitals, High-VolumeShock, CardiogenicAgedFemaleGermanyHospital MortalityHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCardiogenic shockCardiogenic shock networksCase volumeEpidemiologyMechanical circulatory supportMortality

Identifiers

PMID40886086
PMCPMC12766554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.