Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40886008›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its associated factors in Africa: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Tadele Emagneneh, Chalie Mulugeta, Betelhem Ejigu, Abebaw Alamrew, Nigusie Abebaw, Adem Yessuf, Wagaw Abebe, Sefineh Fenta Feleke, Delelegn Tsegaye, Aynalem Yetwale Hiwot and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tadele EmagnenehDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia. tadeleemagneneh@gmail.com.
Chalie MulugetaDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Betelhem EjiguDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Abebaw AlamrewDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Nigusie AbebawDepartment of Midwifery, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Adem YessufDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Wagaw AbebeDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Sefineh Fenta FelekeDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Delelegn TsegayeDepartment of Midwifery, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Aynalem Yetwale HiwotDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Mulat AyeleDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Amanuel Tebabal NegaDepartment of Midwifery, Bahirdar University, Bahirdar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer poses a major public health burden in low- and middle-income countries, especially in Africa, despite being largely preventable through HPV vaccination and screening. This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to identify factors influencing screening uptake, offering evidence to guide targeted interventions and policy responses across the continent.

methodThis umbrella review synthesized evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cervical cancer screening uptake and associated factors among African women. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025639740). A systematic search across five electronic databases, guided by the PICO framework, identified studies reporting prevalence, facilitators, or barriers. After duplicate removal, studies underwent title, abstract, and full-text screening. Data on study characteristics, screening prevalence, and associated factors were extracted. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. A random-effects model in R software was used to estimate pooled prevalence and associated factors. Heterogeneity was evaluated via the I² statistic (> 75% indicating substantial variation), and publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test.

resultThis umbrella review included 11 systematic reviews comprising 214 cross-sectional studies with a total sample of one hundred forty-three thousand women across Africa. The pooled cervical cancer screening uptake was 19% (95% CI: 12–25%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99.9%, p < 0.001). Key factors associated with higher uptake included formal education, employment in the public sector, knowledge of cervical cancer, perceived risk and severity, prior sexually transmitted infections, and getting healthcare providers’ advice.

conclusionCervical cancer screening uptake remains low across Africa, with increased uptake linked to formal education, knowledge, perceived susceptibility, and provider advice. These findings call for targeted, multi-level interventions to improve health literacy, awareness, and provider engagement. Policymakers should strengthen health systems and implement culturally appropriate, community-based strategies to expand access. Given the high heterogeneity (I² = 100%), findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future research should prioritize context-specific, evidence-based approaches to overcome barriers and ensure equitable screening uptake.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPatient Acceptance of Health CareUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAfricaFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAfricaFactorsPrevalence of cervical cancer screeningUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID40886008
PMCPMC12398011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.