Observational studyInternational breastfeeding journal2025
First primary care visit of the newborn and its implications for breastfeeding.
Observational study in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe first primary care visit of the newborn aims to assess neonatal feeding, promote breastfeeding, and identify potential health issues. This study examines the relationship between the timing of the first visit and the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at one month of life.
methodsThis prospective, observational, analytical study was conducted in Spain through a paediatric research network. Data were collected from newborns at both the first visit and the one-month check-up. Selected variables were compared with those from a 2014 study by the same network to estimate EBF rates at the first visit. The primary outcome was EBF prevalence at one month, measured using 2024 data. EBF was defined as receiving only breast milk in the past 24 h. To analyse factors associated with EBF over time, generalised estimating equation models with binomial distribution and logit link function were used in univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsA total of 1952 cases were collected in 2024, with the first visit at 9.3 ± 6.1 days after discharge, compared to 2047 cases in 2014 at 10.7 ± 6.3 days. EBF prevalence at the first visit was 63.1% in 2014 and 62.6% in 2024. In 2024, EBF prevalence at one month was 55.0% (95% CI 52.7, 57.3). Previous maternal breastfeeding experience was the strongest predictor of EBF at one month (AOR 14.61, 95% CI 5.04, 42.33). Having the first visit within 7 days of life was associated with higher EBF maintenance at one month in univariate analysis (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17, 1.53), but not in multivariate analysis (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.47, 1.74).
conclusionsThe first primary care visit of the newborn occurs late in Spain. Rates of EBF have declined over the past decade, highlighting the need for targeted interventions that address modifiable determinants. The strongest predictor for EBF at one month is having previous breastfeeding experience. Early postnatal follow-up of newborns in primary care appears to have a beneficial effect on EBF maintenance at one month, although other determinants may mediate or influence its impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.