ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
A nomogram for individualized prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning-based model combining quantitative parameters of initial chest computed tomography and clinical variables for the prediction of posttraumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Uncovering G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Novel Targets and Biomarkers for Predicting Glioma Prognosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Effect of early intravenous magnesium sulfate on clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis of patients with a concomitance of severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is poor, and early identification of such patients can provide diagnostic and therapeutic assistance for clinical treatment. However, few studies have been conducted to identify the risk of ARDS in patients with sTBI. This study aimed to construct a risk prediction model for ARDS in patients with sTBI and evaluate its efficacy.
methodsFrom 2016 to 2023, 502 patients diagnosed with sTBI were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University. All participants were randomly allocated to either the training or validation group. Feature selection for constructing the prediction model and developing a nomogram was carried out using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The effectiveness and clinical relevance of the model were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), calibration curves, and the decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe study found that 32.9% of patients with sTBI developed ARDS. The model was established based on oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), pneumonia, and fluid volume in the first 24 h. The model showed good discriminative ability with AUC values of 0.841 for the training and 0.821 for the validation groups. Calibration curves demonstrated that the predicted results align well with the actual results. The DCA suggested that the nomogram could lead to clinically beneficial outcomes at a significant threshold.
conclusionsThe diagnostic nomogram for ARDS in sTBI patients demonstrated satisfactory predictive value, assisting clinicians in identifying high-risk patients for ARDS. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400085916.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.