Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885945›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial investigating process and effectiveness of a participatory organizational approach for preventing work-related mental health problems among employees: vital@work.

Luuk Bouwens, Johannes R Anema, Trees T Juurlink, Aartjan T F Beekman, Roosmarijn M C Schelvis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06445101 (Vital@Work), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06445101 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Vital@Work: an Evidence-based Intervention Program for Prevention of Mental Health Complaints at Work, Tailored to Specific Organisational Needs and Contextual Factors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2024 to 2026Enrolled1,040ConditionsStressArmsParticipatory Approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luuk BouwensAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands. l.bouwens@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4306-2162
Johannes R AnemaAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-0917
Trees T JuurlinkAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1801-4067
Aartjan T F BeekmanAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-1410
Roosmarijn M C SchelvisAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7660-0270

Funding

Health~Holland LSHM22035-H025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence links psychosocial work factors to work-related mental health problems, which affect productivity and highlight the need for workplace interventions. In order to establish sustainable change, a participatory strategy that considers the behavioral, organizational, and contextual (BOC) determinants when selecting and implementing interventions is needed. The objective of the current study, Vital@Work, is to prevent and reduce work-related mental health problems by using an evidence based Participatory Approach (PA) as strategy to compose a set of intervention activities tailored to BOC determinants. While the PA has proven effective in other contexts, in this study we examine the impact of contextual factors on the effectiveness of intervention activities delivered through the PA strategy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PA is evaluated as a strategy to implement intervention activities to prevent and reduce unfavorable psychosocial work factors in a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial, including an intervention and control group in four different organizations. These four organizations are characterized by unique BOC determinants and differ in sector, size (small and large organizations), type of organization (private or public) and type of work. Employees in the intervention group receive the PA alongside usual practice, while the control group receives only the usual preventive measures. Effectiveness will be assessed through questionnaires administered at baseline, and 6 (T1) and 12 months (T2) after baseline. According to a power analysis, we strive to include a total sample of 1,040 persons at baseline. As primary outcome, stress will be measured using DASS-21. In addition, various secondary outcomes (sense of community, presenteeism and absenteeism) will be assessed. Longitudinal mixed model analyses, including subgroup analyses, will be conducted, along with a process evaluation to assess implementation. DISCUSSION: The current study will evaluate the PA as a strategy to develop and implement a set of mental health intervention activities tailored to the organizational context, in order to prevent and reduce work-related mental health problems. By doing this, we aim to identify common and sector-specific challenges, contributing to knowledge on tailoring workplace interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial has been retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 31 May 2024 ( NCT06445101).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicOccupational HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth workforceImplementation scienceMental healthPsychosocial interventionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40885945
PMCPMC12398166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.