Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885936›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Do I belong here? The lived experience of navigating health services as a Black person living with stroke in England.

Liz Livingstone, Tushna Vandrevala, Emily Dodd, Mary Cramp, Chunhua Chen, Andrea Drysdale, Evelyn Schiller, Melaet Habtay, Jo White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liz LivingstoneCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0769-442X
Tushna VandrevalaCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, UK. T.Vandrevala@kingston.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-8445
Emily DoddSchool of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9505-257X
Mary CrampSchool of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-8719
Chunhua ChenSchool for Business and Society, University of York, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3720-8000
Andrea DrysdalePublic Contributor, Bristol, UK.
Evelyn SchillerPublic Contributor, Bristol, UK.
Melaet HabtayCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, UK.
Jo WhiteSchool of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-8688

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR204975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlack people are twice as likely to experience stroke, more likely to have a stroke younger and have poorer outcomes than White people. Clinical factors and socio-economic status account for only half of the increased risk, suggesting systemic and structural factors are also involved. Lived experience of Black people living with stroke (BPLS) in England is under-researched. Candidacy Theory describes how people access health services, how perceptions of eligibility and suitability are socially constructed, and how this can perpetuate disadvantage. By applying Candidacy Theory to the findings of our qualitative study on the experiences of BPLS in accessing and navigating health services, we identified some key drivers of current inequalities and ways of addressing them.

methodsOur study aimed to gain greater understanding of how BPLS in England engage with and experience healthcare services. We applied Candidacy Theory to gain insight into experiences of and inequalities faced by this community and implications for service provision. 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults living with stroke, identifying as African, Caribbean or of mixed heritage. Purposeful sampling included men and women with a broad range of ages and ethnicities, recruited via community and national organisation gatekeepers. Interviews were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis and mapped onto the Candidacy Theory framework.

resultsFindings highlighted the plethora of barriers facing BLPS in accessing services, including lack of knowledge of stroke risk or symptoms, and not being believed or listened to by healthcare professionals. While navigating services, participants encountered misalignment with their cultural and age-specific needs. Offers of services were sometimes rejected due to distrust of medical treatment, stigma associated with mental health support, lack of representation, and previous negative experiences, such as microaggression, stereotyping and racism. Participants suggested that trust-building with healthcare professionals could be impeded by historic negative experiences, further exacerbated where there is poor awareness and communication.

conclusionsBPLS face particular disadvantages and barriers in reducing their stroke risk and accessing health services post-stroke. To address these, a holistic, systemic approach is needed, to develop inclusive and “culturally safe” services, build trust and improve accessibility of services.

Indexed as

Black PeopleHealth Services AccessibilityStrokeAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCandidacy theoryCultural safetyEthnicityHealth inequitiesPatient-centred careStroke

Identifiers

PMID40885936
PMCPMC12398089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.