ArticleBMC medical education2025
Analysing YouTube as a health resource: quality and reliability of videos on pediatric appendicitis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the reliability and quality of avascular necrosis of the femoral head content on social media: a cross-sectional content analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study on the quality of IgA nephropathy videos on short video platforms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality and reliability of neonatal jaundice short videos on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Empowering knowledge dissemination: a 5A model for health professionals in IVF health communication through short videos.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of cardiac rehabilitation-related short Chinese videos on Douyin and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality and dissemination of thyroid cancer information on short-video platforms a cross-platform evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to assess the content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos related to appendicitis in children. It analyzes the extent to which these videos provide accurate information to parents and healthcare professionals and evaluates their potential contribution to improving the quality of medical education.
methodsThe keywords "appendicitis" and "appendectomy", along with "pediatrics", "child", and "children", were searched both individually and in all possible combinations. Videos were ranked according to the number of views and the first 60 videos with the highest number of views were included in the analysis. The videos were evaluated by two independent pediatric surgeons using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) and American Medical Association (JAMA) scales. Video Power Index (VPI) values were calculated for each video to assess popularity. Inter-rater agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), group comparisons with Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and correlations with Spearman's coefficient.
resultsOf the analyzed videos, 46 (76.7%) were informational, and 14 (23.3%) were surgical. Videos uploaded by hospitals and doctors scored higher on mDISCERN, GQS, and JAMA scales than those by individuals or private channels (P < 0.001). Animation-containing videos had higher views, likes, and VPI scores than non-animated ones (P = 0.015, P = 0.003, P = 0.006). Surgical videos had significantly higher JAMA scores (P = 0.024) and longer durations (P = 0.021). No significant correlation was observed between quality scores and engagement metrics such as views or likes (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that YouTube videos on pediatric appendicitis are generally of low-to-moderate quality, with no significant correlation between content quality and popularity metrics such as view count or likes. Videos by hospitals and doctors were more reliable, while visual elements like animations increased engagement but not content quality. Findings highlight the need for scientifically accurate and informative content by healthcare professionals to better educate patients, families, and medical students. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.