ArticleBMC public health2025
Co-production as an approach for developing youth advocacy videos on countering unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promoting resilience and sexual and reproductive health among adolescent migrants: a comprehensive approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based participatory research has been a cornerstone of health promotion and public health for over two decades, providing a foundation for co-production approaches that actively involve communities in the design and implementation of interventions. This paper examines the application of co-production as a research approach for developing youth advocacy videos on countering unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising. METHODOLOGY: The research to co-produce videos was conducted with 33 young people aged between 12 and 16 living in the Central Belt of Scotland. The research comprised four stages: workshops, photovoice, focus groups and video development.
resultsThe findings presented are derived from the co-production process involved in creating two youth advocacy videos on unhealthy food marketing and e-cigarette advertising. Through this approach, young co-researchers were provided with opportunities to both learn about and conduct research, fostering their active involvement at every stage of the project. Co-production with young co-researchers enhanced the relevance and impact of advocacy videos, empowering participants through authentic collaboration. While challenges like power dynamics, engagement, and ethical considerations arose, fostering trust, inclusivity, and skill-building ensured success. The project highlighted the importance of youth-led approaches in creating relatable content and developing leadership and practical skills for broader applications. The advocacy videos produced in this study emphasise the critical importance of engaging young co-researchers in the research process. They highlight the necessity of safeguarding young people from harmful advertising practices while empowering them to take an active role in shaping health interventions.
conclusionThis research underscores the value of co-production in health promotion, demonstrating its effectiveness in tailoring interventions to the unique perspectives and needs of the target audience. Notably, it also addresses a significant gap in the existing evidence base, which has historically focused on individual interventions rather than systemic or community-level approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.