Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885888›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Predicting the risk of threatened abortion using machine learning methods: a comparative study.

Zhenning Zhu, Na Wei, Junjie Guo, Changlei Yue, Chao Chen, Zicheng Zhang, Shiyu Wu, Jie Su, Biao Song

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhenning ZhuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Gynecology Department, Xianyang, 712000, China.
Na WeiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Gynecology Department, Xianyang, 712000, China.
Junjie GuoBeijing Goldwind Yi Tong Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, 100000, China.
Changlei YueBeijing Goldwind Yi Tong Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, 100000, China.
Chao ChenBeijing Goldwind Yi Tong Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, 100000, China.
Zicheng ZhangMedical Intelligent Diagnostics Big Data Research Institute, Hohhot, 010020, China.
Shiyu WuMedical Intelligent Diagnostics Big Data Research Institute, Hohhot, 010020, China.
Jie SuMedical Neurobiology Laboratory, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010030, China. sujie0429@126.com.
Biao SongMedical Intelligent Diagnostics Big Data Research Institute, Hohhot, 010020, China. songbiao_511@163.com.

Funding

the Project of Revitalizing Mongolia through Science and Technology 2021- Revitalizing Mongolia through Science and Technology - Independent innovation demonstration zone -01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThreatened abortion, a common pregnancy complication that often leading to abortion, is hard to predict due to its non-specific symptoms and difficulty in differentiating from other early pregnancy bleeding causes. Current diagnostic methods like serial ultrasounds and clinical monitoring are time-consuming and lack timeliness. To fill the gap in using advanced analytics for early detection and risk stratification, this study develops a machine learning (ML) model based on routine blood data to better predict threatened abortion, providing a reference for early detection and intervention.

methodsIn this study, we collected medical records from January 2022 to March 2024. We analyzed data from 1764 patients with threatened abortion and 1489 healthy controls. Blood test data of all participants were gathered. The Z-score normalization technique was applied to standardize blood routine indicators. This reduced the influence of outliers and noise. During hyperparameter optimization, 'class_weight="balanced"' was set to handle sample imbalance. The screening data was partitioned into a training set of 2928 cases (including the validation set) and a test set of 325 cases at an 8:1:1 ratio. Python was used to facilitate data transformation. Eight different ML algorithms-Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Decision Tree (DT) and Naive Bayes (NB)-were used to construct a threatened abortion prediction model. The prediction performances of the ML models were evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) values. We used the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to explain the models.

resultsComparatively, the DNN model showed the highest predictive performance among the eight models, with the highest AUC value of 96.76% and top metrics for accuracy (91.88%), specificity (91.62%), sensitivity (92.11%), and F1 score (92.48%). SHAP analysis identified Red Cell Distribution Width - Standard Deviation (RDW-SD), Platelet Distribution Width (PDW), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), Red Cell Distribution Width - Coefficient of Variation (RDW-CV), Absolute Basophil Count (BAS#), Platelet Count (PLT), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) and Lymphocyte Percentage (LYM) as the most influential features in predicting threatened abortion, with PDW, RDW-CV, BAS#, PLT, MCHC and LYM positively contributing to the prediction, whereas RDW-SD and MPV had negative contributions.

conclusionsOur research on constructing a prediction model for threatened abortion through routine blood tests has revealed the great potential of ML algorithms in detecting threatened abortion. This algorithm is expected to analyse routine blood data to identify at-risk pregnancies at an early stage, significantly improving the early detection of this common pregnancy complication. It will assist healthcare providers in intervening earlier and reducing the incidence of abortion. However, before the model can be translated into routine clinical applications, more extensive validation studies are still needed.

Indexed as

Abortion, ThreatenedMachine LearningAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentHematologic testsMachine learningPredictionThreatened abortion

Identifiers

PMID40885888
PMCPMC12398114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.