ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Predicting the risk of threatened abortion using machine learning methods: a comparative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 Scores with Threatened Miscarriage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based endometrial ultrasound radiomics habitat analysis for predicting pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting incident gestational hypothyroidism using clinical laboratory markers.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and internal-external validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for multidrug resistance in mechanically ventilated ICU patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The β-hCG-TNF-α-T cell axis in threatened abortion: unraveling the pathogenic cascade from aberrant glycosylation to inflammatory demise.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThreatened abortion, a common pregnancy complication that often leading to abortion, is hard to predict due to its non-specific symptoms and difficulty in differentiating from other early pregnancy bleeding causes. Current diagnostic methods like serial ultrasounds and clinical monitoring are time-consuming and lack timeliness. To fill the gap in using advanced analytics for early detection and risk stratification, this study develops a machine learning (ML) model based on routine blood data to better predict threatened abortion, providing a reference for early detection and intervention.
methodsIn this study, we collected medical records from January 2022 to March 2024. We analyzed data from 1764 patients with threatened abortion and 1489 healthy controls. Blood test data of all participants were gathered. The Z-score normalization technique was applied to standardize blood routine indicators. This reduced the influence of outliers and noise. During hyperparameter optimization, 'class_weight="balanced"' was set to handle sample imbalance. The screening data was partitioned into a training set of 2928 cases (including the validation set) and a test set of 325 cases at an 8:1:1 ratio. Python was used to facilitate data transformation. Eight different ML algorithms-Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Decision Tree (DT) and Naive Bayes (NB)-were used to construct a threatened abortion prediction model. The prediction performances of the ML models were evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) values. We used the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to explain the models.
resultsComparatively, the DNN model showed the highest predictive performance among the eight models, with the highest AUC value of 96.76% and top metrics for accuracy (91.88%), specificity (91.62%), sensitivity (92.11%), and F1 score (92.48%). SHAP analysis identified Red Cell Distribution Width - Standard Deviation (RDW-SD), Platelet Distribution Width (PDW), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), Red Cell Distribution Width - Coefficient of Variation (RDW-CV), Absolute Basophil Count (BAS#), Platelet Count (PLT), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) and Lymphocyte Percentage (LYM) as the most influential features in predicting threatened abortion, with PDW, RDW-CV, BAS#, PLT, MCHC and LYM positively contributing to the prediction, whereas RDW-SD and MPV had negative contributions.
conclusionsOur research on constructing a prediction model for threatened abortion through routine blood tests has revealed the great potential of ML algorithms in detecting threatened abortion. This algorithm is expected to analyse routine blood data to identify at-risk pregnancies at an early stage, significantly improving the early detection of this common pregnancy complication. It will assist healthcare providers in intervening earlier and reducing the incidence of abortion. However, before the model can be translated into routine clinical applications, more extensive validation studies are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.