ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Exploring Diabetes Clinical Trial Participation: A Diverse Group Interview Study.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical trial participation is critical for ensuring new medical treatments are safe and effective for all populations. Native Hawaiian (NH), Pacific Islander (PI), and Filipino individuals experience a disproportionate burden of type 2 diabetes yet remain underrepresented in clinical trials. The primary objective was to generate insights into the motivations, barriers, and communication preferences around clinical trial participation among hospitalized patients from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds, particularly groups that have been historically underrepresented in research.
methodsWe conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with 56 hospitalized patients at a medical center in Hawai'i. Participants ranked reasons for joining or not joining a clinical trial and responded to open-ended questions. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Qualitative responses were analyzed using Rapid Qualitative Analysis and organized by race/ethnicity.
resultsWhile 84% expressed willingness to join a trial, most had never been asked. NH participants prioritized helping their community and accessing new treatments. PI participants emphasized helping their doctor and advancing science. Filipino participants valued new treatments and contributing to science. White participants ranked financial incentives and community benefit. Major barriers included concerns about unknown medication risks, lack of understanding, and mistrust-particularly among PI and Filipino participants. Many NH and PI participants noted that helping family members was a key motivator. Across all groups, preferred communication strategies included physician referrals, text messaging, and physical mail.
conclusionTailored recruitment strategies emphasizing family and community benefits, involvement of trusted local providers, and culturally relevant communication may enhance clinical trial participation among underrepresented populations with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40885887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.