Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885879›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Impact of an occupational back-support exoskeleton on muscle synergies during a pick-up movement.

Antoine Cohic, Thibaut Segers, Ornwipa Thamsuwan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antoine CohicDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada. antoine.cohic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0530-0972
Thibaut SegersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada.
Ornwipa ThamsuwanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-536X

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022-0327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile passive back-support exoskeletons have been shown to reduce back-muscle activity during laboratory-simulated tasks, their influence on motor control is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a passive back-support exoskeleton on muscle synergies, the predefined groups of coordinated muscle activations used by the central nervous system to produce natural movements.

methodsNineteen participants performed several pick-up tasks with 500 g weights, with and without a back-exoskeleton. During these trials, surface electromyography of eight muscles involved in the task was recorded. Muscle synergies were then extracted from these signals using non-negative matrix factorization. For each participant, we computed silhouette scores and performed statistical tests to evaluate the distinction between synergies extracted from the trials with and without the exoskeleton.

resultsTwo to three muscle synergies were sufficient to account for the activations of the eight muscles during the movements. The inter-participant clustering of the mean synergies indicated that participants used subjective motor strategies to perform the task, and the silhouette scores highlighted differences between synergies of the two conditions for 70.6% of the participants.

conclusionOur findings indicate that an exoskeleton can lead to a modification of muscle recruitment patterns. However, the impact of the exoskeleton on muscle synergies differed among participants, which highlights the importance of the wearer's experience and adaptation to the equipment.

Indexed as

Back MusclesExoskeleton DeviceMuscle, SkeletalAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultElectromyographyExoskeletonHierarchical clusteringMuscle synergyNon-negative matrix factorization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.