ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Adoption and perioperative outcomes of single-port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy in the state of Michigan: a MUSIC-KIDNEY analysis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in perioperative, oncological, and renal function outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical Determinants of Outcomes in Partial Nephrectomy: a Contemporary Review.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Commentary on "Adoption and perioperative outcomes of single-port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy in the state of Michigan: a MUSIC-KIDNEY analysis".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a standard-of-care nephron-sparing intervention for clinical stage T1 renal masses (cT1RMs). We evaluated RPN outcomes performed using the da Vinci single port (SP) and multiport (Xi) platforms in a statewide quality improvement collaborative since SP introduction in Michigan. MUSIC-KIDNEY maintains a prospective registry of newly diagnosed cT1RM. Six surgeons from three practices within MUSIC have performed both. The perioperative data from patients undergoing SP and Xi RPN with these surgeons October 2020-August 2023 were analyzed. These surgeons completed a survey to assess reasons for choosing SP over Xi RPN. Of 828 RPNs performed by all MUSIC surgeons in the same duration, a total of 314 (38%) RPNs were completed by the six included surgeons who performed 121 (39%) RPNs with SP and 193 (61%) with Xi. SP RPN more commonly utilized the retroperitoneal approach than Xi RPN (80% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). When comparing perioperative outcomes, the experienced SP surgeon utilized same-day (55% vs. 9.5% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001) and opioid-free discharge (77% vs. 22% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) significantly more than other urologists for both SP and Xi cases without a significant increase in positive surgical margins, ED visits, or readmissions. The survey results showed that surgeons early in the learning curve for SP RPN prefer to use SP for smaller, less complex masses. Although there has been limited adoption of SP RPN, initial experiences with SP RPN demonstrate procedural safety comparable to Xi RPN. Both robotic systems provide advantages, with SP mainly facilitating the retroperitoneal approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40885878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.