Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885878›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Adoption and perioperative outcomes of single-port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy in the state of Michigan: a MUSIC-KIDNEY analysis.

Yuzhi Wang, Jerry Zhuo, Bradley Christensen, Kangli Chen, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Banna Hussain, Mackenzie Gammons, Mustafa Almajedi, Savannah Grandy, Adam Matynowski and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yuzhi Wang *Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jerry Zhuo *Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Bradley ChristensenWestern Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Kangli ChenDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stephanie Daignault-NewtonDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Banna HussainVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mackenzie GammonsDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mustafa AlmajediDepartment of Urology, McLaren Macomb, Mt. Clemens, MI, USA.
Savannah GrandyDepartment of Urology, McLaren Macomb, Mt. Clemens, MI, USA.
Adam MatynowskiDepartment of Urology, McLaren Macomb, Mt. Clemens, MI, USA.
Sabrina L NoyesCorewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Mahin MirzaDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sugandh ShettyCorewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Syed Mohammed A JafriCorewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Conrad TobertCorewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Christopher BredeCorewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Craig G RogersVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Brian R LaneCorewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Ryan NelsonMichigan Institute of Urology, 11051 Hall Road, Suite 220 , Utica, MI, 48317, USA. nelsonr@michiganurology.com.
Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC)

Funding

Corewell Health Foundation West Michigan Betz Family Endowment for Cancer Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a standard-of-care nephron-sparing intervention for clinical stage T1 renal masses (cT1RMs). We evaluated RPN outcomes performed using the da Vinci single port (SP) and multiport (Xi) platforms in a statewide quality improvement collaborative since SP introduction in Michigan. MUSIC-KIDNEY maintains a prospective registry of newly diagnosed cT1RM. Six surgeons from three practices within MUSIC have performed both. The perioperative data from patients undergoing SP and Xi RPN with these surgeons October 2020-August 2023 were analyzed. These surgeons completed a survey to assess reasons for choosing SP over Xi RPN. Of 828 RPNs performed by all MUSIC surgeons in the same duration, a total of 314 (38%) RPNs were completed by the six included surgeons who performed 121 (39%) RPNs with SP and 193 (61%) with Xi. SP RPN more commonly utilized the retroperitoneal approach than Xi RPN (80% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). When comparing perioperative outcomes, the experienced SP surgeon utilized same-day (55% vs. 9.5% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001) and opioid-free discharge (77% vs. 22% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) significantly more than other urologists for both SP and Xi cases without a significant increase in positive surgical margins, ED visits, or readmissions. The survey results showed that surgeons early in the learning curve for SP RPN prefer to use SP for smaller, less complex masses. Although there has been limited adoption of SP RPN, initial experiences with SP RPN demonstrate procedural safety comparable to Xi RPN. Both robotic systems provide advantages, with SP mainly facilitating the retroperitoneal approach.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansMaleMichiganMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeKidney cancerMinimally invasiveSingle port

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.