Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885877›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Telesurgery across continents: a scoping review.

Sidharth Misra, Zainab Yusufali Motiwala, Fatima Nadeem, Shruti Anchule, Apoorva Sanjay Lathkar, Avanti Barapatre, Sneha Bhingardive, Subhankita Kar, Saloni Sanjay Lathkar, Danny Darlington

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Legal Frameworks for AI-driven Diagnostics and Robotic Surgery.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sidharth MisraUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Zainab Yusufali MotiwalaJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh, India.
Fatima NadeemJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh, India.
Shruti AnchuleTerna Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India. shrutianchule42@gmail.com.
Apoorva Sanjay LathkarMahatma Gandhi Medical College, Mumbai, India.
Avanti BarapatreTerna Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sneha BhingardiveTerna Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India.
Subhankita KarTerna Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India.
Saloni Sanjay LathkarTerna Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India.
Danny DarlingtonConsultant Urological Surgeon, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercontinental telesurgery is a surgery where surgeons operate on patients across continents using robots and telecommunication connections. Many parts of the world have limited access to safe and reliable surgery. This review is to understand the emerging technology and infrastructure in intercontinental telesurgery to bridge gaps in surgical care. This scoping review synthesized information from peer reviewed and gray literature published between 2001 and 2025. Databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, and Europe PMC were utilized. The review is organized thematically into schematic of intercontinental telesurgery, classification, technological enablers, real-world case studies, framework and guidelines, and legal and ethical issues. 262 records were identified through database searching and manual screening. After removing the duplicates, 250 remained; 39 met the inclusion criteria after screening and text review. The human intercontinental telesurgeries were safely completed with 150-300 ms latency, with no serious complications and outcomes comparable to local robotic surgery. Preclinical models confirmed long-distance viability via hybrid networks with stable latency. Technological catalysts included advanced robotic platforms and enhanced hepatic feedback. Constant obstacles were network instability, legal uncertainty, limited scalability, and surgeon fatigue. Intercontinental telesurgery has the potential to evolve the global surgical inequities, yet its sustainable adaptation needs more than just technological preparedness. Combined efforts in infrastructure development, equitable access, and ethical regulation are necessary. Future systems must ensure that this innovation serves all populations and not just those in high-resource environments by incorporating autonomy, digital twins, and a global legal framework.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresTelemedicineHumansCross-border surgeryIntercontinental telesurgeryNetwork connectivityRemote surgery collaborationRobotic surgeryTelecommunication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.