ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Telesurgery across continents: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Remote robot-assisted renal surgery: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of real-world evidence.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in robotic, teleoperated, and remote surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis (2015-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Clinical application of robotic telesurgery in the Brazilian public health system: a consecutive case series.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Feasibility of robotic telesurgery over wired and private 5 G networks within Brazil's public health system (SUS): a pilot study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Tracing the global expansion of telesurgery research: a bibliometric exploration of 94 countries and six continents.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Legal Frameworks for AI-driven Diagnostics and Robotic Surgery.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intercontinental telesurgery is a surgery where surgeons operate on patients across continents using robots and telecommunication connections. Many parts of the world have limited access to safe and reliable surgery. This review is to understand the emerging technology and infrastructure in intercontinental telesurgery to bridge gaps in surgical care. This scoping review synthesized information from peer reviewed and gray literature published between 2001 and 2025. Databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, and Europe PMC were utilized. The review is organized thematically into schematic of intercontinental telesurgery, classification, technological enablers, real-world case studies, framework and guidelines, and legal and ethical issues. 262 records were identified through database searching and manual screening. After removing the duplicates, 250 remained; 39 met the inclusion criteria after screening and text review. The human intercontinental telesurgeries were safely completed with 150-300 ms latency, with no serious complications and outcomes comparable to local robotic surgery. Preclinical models confirmed long-distance viability via hybrid networks with stable latency. Technological catalysts included advanced robotic platforms and enhanced hepatic feedback. Constant obstacles were network instability, legal uncertainty, limited scalability, and surgeon fatigue. Intercontinental telesurgery has the potential to evolve the global surgical inequities, yet its sustainable adaptation needs more than just technological preparedness. Combined efforts in infrastructure development, equitable access, and ethical regulation are necessary. Future systems must ensure that this innovation serves all populations and not just those in high-resource environments by incorporating autonomy, digital twins, and a global legal framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40885877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.