ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2025
Prediction of QTc Prolongation in Acute Poisoning with Atypical Antipsychotics Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Study from Poison Control Center.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application, challenges and prospects of artificial intelligence in acute poisoning management.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical antipsychotics have experienced a significant increase in use across various disorders, coinciding with a rise in acute intoxication. This retrospective study predicts prolonged QTc interval and the necessity for mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute atypical antipsychotic poisoning using machine learning techniques. This retrospective study included 355 patients with a mean age of 26.1 ± 9.6 years. The overall prevalence of the investigated outcomes was 5.5% for prolonged QTc interval and 7.1% for MV. Eight classifiers were developed, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and five tree-based models: Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Gradient Boosting Models. Model validation was conducted through external validation using the testing dataset and an internal five-fold cross-validation after optimizing the hyperparameters. As a predictor of prolonged QTc interval, all tree-based models achieved perfect specificity, recall, precision, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) of 100% using the training dataset. Similar performance was reported in models predicting the necessity for MV. Upon validation, the tree-based models for predicting prolonged QTc intervals maintained good AUCs, ranging between 0.930 and 0.958 in the training dataset and between 0.927 and 0.949 in the testing dataset. In terms of accuracy, the tree-based models exhibited good values in both external and five-fold cross-validation, with all values above 0.901. The observed declines in recall and precision during the validation of the proposed models underscore the need for future studies to utilize larger validation cohorts, thereby enabling the generalization of the proposed models in relevant clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40885876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.