ArticleScientific reports2025
Segmentation-enhanced approach for emotion detection from EEG signals using the fuzzy C-mean and SVM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of EEG signals for determining emotion is one of the most important topics in the field of artificial intelligence. It can be applied in a wide variety of areas, such as emotional health care and the man/machine interface. The purpose of the paper is the demonstration that emotions may be identified using EEG recordings in the hybrid approach based on the differentiated support vector machine (SVM) models with various types of kernel functions, as well as fuzzy C-means. The EEG signal of two subjects was recorded with the help of the Muse headband; the signal data was described as positive, neutral, or negative emotions. A Gauss kernel was the second-best outcome (95.78%), and a linear kernel was the best outcome (97.66%). Precision, recall, and F1-scores were used in establishing the performance of the SVM technique in emotion classification in conjunction with the fuzzy C-means classification approach. Besides covering the discussion on the importance of kernel choice in achieving good performance in SVM-based models, the analysis also showed that there was a potential to use EEG-based emotion detection. Moreover, one-way ANOVA statistical analysis has expressed that the linear kernel did perform significantly better as compared to other kernels (p < 0.05). To confirm that the proposed system would be rather robust, other deep learning models (CNN-LSTM hybrids) were designed and tested, the results of which proved that they had similar performance and at the same time less accurate results than the linear SVM. These results indicate the efficacy of SVM and the optimization of kernel parameters along with the integration of fuzzy logic in recognizing emotions based on EEG records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.