ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025
Enabling secure and self determined health data sharing and consent management.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multimodal observable cues in mood, anxiety, and borderline personality disorders: a review of reviews to inform explainable AI in mental health.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Blockchain for Digital Health Governance: Evidence Gap Map and Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Patient-governed agentic health data exchange.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Digital Pathology Archives as Long-Term Clinical Memory: A Self-Sovereign Identity-Based Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring needs and priorities in digital health management for rare disease patients and their caregivers: A mixed-methods study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Advancing data protections for implantable brain-computer interfaces.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Enhancing the resilience of remote patient monitoring and hospital-at-home systems: a digital-twin-based framework.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Nurses as guardians of time: the hidden clinical value of continuous care in geriatrics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- A Blockchain-Based Architecture for Dynamic and Auditable Patient Consent in Secondary Use of Health Data.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2026Article
- A user-driven consent platform for health data sharing in digital health applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital health tools generate vast sensitive data not only in clinic but also from apps and wearables. Effective consent management builds trust, increasing willingness for data sharing. We present a novel early-stage conceptual framework, reviewing technologies like blockchain, self-sovereign identity, and de-identified tokens for integration into a consent management system to enable tracking of consent and data utilization. This balances data access and privacy to encourage data sharing and improve healthcare.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.