Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885789›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Semi-supervised GAN with hybrid regularization and evolutionary hyperparameter tuning for accurate melanoma detection.

Alireza Golkarieh, Parsa Razmara, Ahmadreza Lagzian, Amirhosein Dolatabadi, Seyed Jalaleddin Mousavirad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. WaveGNN: Integrating Graph Neural Networks and Transformers for Decay-Aware Classification of Irregular Clinical Time-Series.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alireza GolkariehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Michigan, USA.
Parsa RazmaraUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ahmadreza LagzianThe city university of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Amirhosein DolatabadiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Jalaleddin MousaviradDepartment of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden. seyedjalaleddin.mousavirad@miun.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma, influenced by changes in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), requires early detection for effective treatment. Traditional melanoma research often employs supervised learning methods, which necessitate large, labeled datasets and are sensitive to hyperparameter settings. This paper presents a diagnostic model for melanoma, utilizing a semi-supervised generative adversarial network (SS-GAN) to enhance the accuracy of the classifier. The model is further optimized through an enhanced artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for hyperparameter tuning. Conventional SS-GANs face challenges such as mode collapse, weak modeling of global dependencies, poor generalization to unlabeled data, and unreliable pseudo-labels. To address these issues, we propose four improvements. First, we add a reconstruction loss in the generator to minimize mode collapse and maintain structural integrity. Second, we introduce self-attention in both the generator and the discriminator to model long-range dependencies and enrich features. Third, we apply consistency regularization on the discriminator to stabilize predictions on augmented samples. Fourth, we use pseudo-labeling that leverages only confident predictions on unlabeled data for supervised training in the discriminator. To reduce dependence on hyperparameter choices, the Random Key method is applied, enhanced through a mutual learning-based ABC (ML-ABC) optimization. We evaluated the model on four datasets: International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2020 (ISIC-2020), Human Against Machine's 10,000 images (HAM10000), Pedro Hispano Hospital (PH2), and DermNet datasets. The model demonstrated a strong ability to distinguish between melanoma and non-melanoma images, achieving F-measures of 92.769%, 93.376%, 90.629%, and 92.617%, respectively. This approach enhances melanoma image classification under limited labeled data, as validated on multiple benchmark datasets. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/AmirhoseinDolatabadi/Melanoma .

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial bee colonyGenerative adversarial networkHyperparameter optimizationMelanoma detectionSemi-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40885789
PMCPMC12398595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.