Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885785›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2025

Cytotoxicity of

Kim Lindland, Asta Juzeniene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kim LindlandDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316, Oslo, Norway. lindland@oncoinvent.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-7589
Asta JuzenieneDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 334823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer remains a significant global health challenge, with approximately 75% of cases presenting as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Despite standard treatment with transurethral resection and intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy, up to 40% of patients develop resistance or progress to muscle-invasive disease. Targeted alpha-emitting radionuclide therapy offers promising therapeutic potential through the selective delivery of high linear energy transfer radiation to tumor cells while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. PTK7 is overexpressed in various malignancies, including bladder cancer, and is therefore a viable therapeutic target. This study evaluated the preclinical efficacy of [

resultsPTK7 expression analysis revealed varying antigen densities across five bladder cancer cell lines, ranging from approximately 10,000 to 70,000 sites per cell. The chimeric anti-PTK7 antibody demonstrated apparent equilibrium dissociation constants of 10-44 nM with moderate binding affinity suitable for therapeutic applications. [

conclusionsThese findings support PTK7 as a therapeutic target for bladder cancer and demonstrate the potential of [

Indexed as

212PbBladder cancerInternalizationMonoclonal antibodyPTK7 (Protein tyrosine kinase 7)Targeted alpha therapy (TAT)

Identifiers

PMID40885785
PMCPMC12398452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.