ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantification of liver steatosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease based on body composition analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nomogram integrating serological markers and clinical parameters for predicting severe hepatic steatosis in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver steatosis can be measured with ultrasound techniques such as the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) on an equipped FibroScan. For more widespread screening and quantitative evaluation of liver steatosis, a predictive model using body composition data obtained by body bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was developed. In the training cohort including 365 patients suspected of having metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, a stepwise selection method was used to determine the BIA-related variables associated with CAP. Using the significant variables, a predictive formula was developed, and the estimated CAP (eCAP) was obtained. The diagnostic performance of eCAP was tested to predict liver steatosis with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in the training, validation (n = 408) and liver biopsy (n = 158) cohorts. The body fat mass of the trunk, skeletal muscle index and age were significant variables associated with CAP. eCAP was obtained as 219.1 - 0.4479 × age + 3.476 × BFM of trunk + 7.045 × SMI. The area under the ROC curve was 0.814 in the training cohort and 0.808 in the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity were 72.5% and 82.1% with a cut-off value of eCAP = 281 dB/m. For sensitivity ≥ 90%, the cut-off of eCAP was 266 dB/m. In the liver biopsy cohort, the presence of pathological steatosis was predicted with eCAP as an area under the ROC curve = 0.826, which was not statistically different from CAP (0.871). Completely non-invasive BIA-based eCAP could predict liver steatosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.