ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Adherence to digital pregnancy care - lessons learned from the SMART start feasibility study.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low-Dose Aspirin Recommendations for Preeclampsia Risk Reduction: A Systematic Review Focused on Black Patients : Current Hypertension Reports.Current hypertension reports · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of the uptake and usability of the pregnant women surveillance system (SIMG): A cross-sectional pilot study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Awareness, Preferences, and Willingness to Download Pregnancy Health Management Apps Among Women in Louisiana: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Women's Health Wearables: From Continuous Signals to Actionable Digital Phenotypes Across the Reproductive Lifespan.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Experiential Classes Plus Digital Logging in Antenatal Care for Pregnant Women in China: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Using smart devices for prenatal care: Assessing the willingness among women with pregnancy-related anxiety.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The World Health Organization increasingly highlights the role of digital health technologies in supporting prenatal care. Despite this potential, the real-world implementation of such technologies remains limited, even in high-income countries with established analog systems. We developed a comprehensive digital pregnancy care framework, SMART Start and evaluated it in a prospective study involving 528 pregnant individuals in Germany. This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00036867). Participants were equipped with a mobile app and self-examination technologies. The mobile app featured study functionality, pregnancy-related questionnaires, digital maternity records, and pregnancy-supportive content. Self-examination technologies included a standard care kit for home measurements of routine prenatal care parameters (weight, blood pressure, urinalysis), and an innovative kit with novel sensors (smartwatch, sleep analyzer). Here, we analyzed the adherence to digital pregnancy care and present the lessons learned from a clinical and technical perspective. Among all participants, 49% engaged with at least one digital package. Weekly weight tracking reached adherence rates up to 67% in the first 14 weeks. Adherence to blood pressure and urinalysis measurements was lower, peaking at 20 and 28%, respectively, but remained stable over time. Questionnaire completion rates varied in dependence on their length and complexity. 31% of users disengaged at the time of registration. While overall retention time did not significantly differ across participant subgroups (all p > 0.05), adherence analyses revealed meaningful group-level differences in engagement with specific self-examination protocols. This discrepancy underscores that continued participation does not necessarily imply consistent engagement with all components of the digital care model. The adherence to the study schedule demonstrated that pregnant individuals are generally willing and capable of engaging in home-based, multimodal self-monitoring; however, the importance of adaptive scheduling, patient-centered feedback, agile development, and interdisciplinary collaboration should be addressed by future studies. The presented SMART Start framework offers a pathway towards data-driven, personalized pregnancy care while potentially reducing the demand for conventional healthcare infrastructure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.