ArticleNature communications2025
A streamlined base editor engineering strategy to reduce bystander editing.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating base editors: a decade of progress from the bench to the clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Editing around the target: epitope engineering to protect stem cell grafts.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Engineered Transformer Base Editor with Enhanced Editing Efficiency.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- On-target and off-target activities of CRISPR therapeutics across scales.Trends in biotechnology · 2026Review
- Adenine base editor for knockout of proteins: A practical guide from design to analysis with updated MultiEditRbatch.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Long-term restoration of auditory function in a DFNA2 mouse model by adenine base editing.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Production of Cell Models with Differential Zygosity Using CRISPR Base Editors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Long-read sequencing and next-generation CRISPR editors: a unified pipeline for rare disease precision medicine with ethical and regulatory perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advances and Applications of Plant Base Editing Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Base editing (BE) can permanently correct over half of known human pathogenic genetic variants without requiring a repair template, thus serving as a promising therapeutic tool to treat a broad spectrum of genetic diseases. However, the broad activity windows of current base editors pose a major challenge to their therapeutic application. Here, we show that integrating a naturally occurring oligonucleotide binding module into the deaminase active center of TadA-8e, a highly active deoxyadenosine deaminase, enhances its editing specificity. When conjugated with a Cas9 nickase or alternative PAM Cas9 variants, the engineered TadA variant-TadA-NW1-consistently achieves robust A-to-G editing efficiencies within an editing window consisting of four nucleotides, substantially narrower than the 10-bp editing window of the TadA-8e-derived ABEs. Moreover, compared to ABE8e, ABE-NW1 shows significantly decreased Cas9-dependent and -independent off-target activity while maintaining similar on-target editing efficiency. Further, TadA-NW1 can be reprogrammed to perform desired cytidine deamination and adenine transversion within a restricted editing window. Finally, in a cystic fibrosis (CF) cell model, ABE-NW1 outperforms existing ABEs in accurately and efficiently correcting the CFTR W1282X variant, one of the most common CF-causing mutations. In all, we engineered a suite of base editors with refined activity windows, enabling more precise base editing. Importantly, this study presents a streamlined genome editor re-engineering strategy to accelerate the development of therapeutic base editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.