ArticleNature communications2025
Deep indel mutagenesis reveals the regulatory and modulatory architecture of alternative exon splicing.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable distillation reveals that deep learning splicing models suffer from pervasive confounders and blind spots.Genome biology · 2026Article
- RNA binding proteins (RBPs) on genetic stability and diseases.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While altered pre-mRNA splicing is a frequent mechanism by which genetic variants cause disease, the regulatory architecture of human exons remains poorly understood. Antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) that target pre-mRNA splicing have been approved as therapeutics for various pathologies including patient-customised treatments for rare diseases, but AON discovery is currently slow and expensive, limiting the wider adoption of the approach. Here we show that deep indel mutagenesis (DIM) -which can be made experimentally at very low cost - provides an efficient strategy to chart the regulatory landscape of human exons and rapidly identify candidate splicing-modulating oligonucleotides. DIM reveals autonomous effects of insertions, while systematic deletion scans delineate the checkerboard architecture of sequential enhancers and silencers in a model alternative exon. The results also suggest a mechanism for repression of transmembrane domain-encoding exons and for the generation of microexons. Leveraging deep learning tools, we provide a resource, DANGO, that predicts the splicing regulatory landscape of all human exons and can help to identify effective splicing-modulating antisense oligonucleotides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.