Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40885585›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2025

Epidemiological and demographic trends and projections in global health from 1970 to 2050: a descriptive analysis from the third Lancet Commission on Investing in Health, Global Health 2050.

Angela Y Chang, Sarah Bolongaita, Bochen Cao, Marcia C Castro, Omar Karlsson, Wenhui Mao, Ole F Norheim, Osondu Ogbuoji, Dean T Jamison

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of the Association Between Weight Status and Myopia in Children and Adolescents and Development of a Screening Model Based on Body Fat Percentage.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Angela Y ChangDanish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Electronic address: achang@health.sdu.dk.
Sarah BolongaitaBergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting (BCEPS), Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bochen CaoDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marcia C CastroDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Omar KarlssonDuke University Population Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Centre for Economic Demography, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Wenhui MaoDuke Global Health Innovation Center and Innovations in Healthcare, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Centre for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ole F NorheimBergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting (BCEPS), Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Osondu OgbuojiCentre for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Dean T JamisonInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

STALLARD Admin Supp: Predicting Future Care Needs and Costs for Individual Medicare Enrollees with Incident Suspected Alzheimer's DiseaseP30AG034424 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT M. LYNCH · 2009 to 2026
$12.2M
Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Giovanna M Merli · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034424NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic analyses of global health trends can provide an accurate narrative of progress and challenges. We analysed the impact of changing age-specific mortality (epidemiology) and age structure (demography) on crude death rates (CDRs) and causes of death with large or rising mortality to inform the third Lancet Commission on Investing in Health.

methodsData from the World Population Prospects 2024 and Global Health Estimates 2021 were used to assess epidemiological and demographic trends, including CDR (defined as the total number of deaths divided by the total mid-year population, reported per 1000 population), all-cause age-specific mortality rates for 1970-2050, and selected cause-specific mortality rates from 2000-19. We excluded data for 2020-23 to avoid effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. For estimating decadal changes in cause-specific mortality rates, we combined the estimates into the following age groups: 0-14, 15-49, 50-69, and 70 years and older.

findingsMortality rates declined substantially across age groups in most regions, with rapid improvements observed in recent decades. Between the 2000s (ie, 2000-10) and 2010s (ie, 2010-19), the mortality decline accelerated in China, central and eastern Europe, India, and Latin America and the Caribbean in ages 0-14 years and 15-49 years, but decelerated in the north Atlantic, the USA, and western Pacific and southeast Asia. For ages 50-69 years, mortality decline decelerated in all regions except sub-Saharan Africa. The USA experienced not only deceleration but increase in mortality rates in those aged 15-49 years and 50-69 years. Globally, the lowest CDR was reported in 2019. In the past, CDR has declined primarily because of decreasing age-specific mortality rates. Future trends suggest that changing population age structure will drive a large increase in CDR. Age-specific mortality rates from major diseases declined once population changes were accounted for. The exception was diabetes, with accelerating increase in age-specific death rates in all regions, with especially high rates in central and eastern Europe and India.

interpretationThere is reason for optimism regarding global health progress, but disparities and emerging challenges persist. Falling age-specific mortality rates show progress; however, rapid ageing brings new challenges. Slowing mortality declines in some regions require enhanced efforts. Rising mortality among middle-aged Americans emphasises that continuous improvements require concerted efforts. Key recommendations include prioritising interventions to address specific health challenges and adapting health-care systems to demographic transitions.

fundingThe Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Global HealthMortalityAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolDemographyFemaleForecastingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID40885585
PMCPMC12394659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.