Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884895›Full record

ArticleNeural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society2026

Learning in PINNs: Phase transition, diffusion equilibrium, and generalization.

Sokratis J Anagnostopoulos, Juan Diego Toscano, Nikolaos Stergiopulos, George Em Karniadakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. KKANs: Ku̇rková-Kolmogorov-Arnold networks and their learning dynamics.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  7. MR-AIV revealsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. From PINNs to PIKANs: recent advances in physics-informed machine learning.Machine learning for computational science and engineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. InferringInterface focus · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sokratis J AnagnostopoulosLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, EPFL, Lausanne, 1015, VD, Switzerland. Electronic address: sokratis.anagnostopoulos@epfl.ch.
Juan Diego ToscanoSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, 02912, RI, USA.
Nikolaos StergiopulosLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, EPFL, Lausanne, 1015, VD, Switzerland.
George Em KarniadakisSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, 02912, RI, USA; Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, 02912, RI, USA.

Funding

CRCNS: Waste-clearance flows in the brain measured using physics-informed neural networkR01AT012312 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Douglas H Kelley · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT012312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the learning dynamics of fully-connected neural networks through the lens of the neural gradient signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), examining the behavior of first-order optimizers in non-convex objectives. By interpreting the drift/diffusion phases as proposed in the information bottleneck theory, we identify a third phase termed "diffusion equilibrium" (DE), a stable training phase characterized by highly-ordered neural gradients across the sample space. This phase is marked by an abrupt (first-order) transition, where sample-wise gradients align (SNR increases), and stable optimizer convergence. Moreover, we find that when homogeneous residuals are also met across the sample space during the DE phase, this leads to better generalization, as the optimization steps are equally sensitive to each sample. Based on this observation, we propose a sample-wise re-weighting scheme, which considerably improves the residual homogeneity and generalization in quadratic loss functions, by targeting the problematic samples with large residuals and vanishing gradients. Finally, we explore the information compression phenomenon, pinpointing a significant saturation-induced compression of activations at the DE phase transition, driven by the sample-wise gradient directional alignment. Interestingly, it is during the saturation of activations that the model converges, with deeper layers experiencing negligible information loss. Supported by experimental examples on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which highlight the critical role of gradient agreement due to their inherent PDE-based interdependence of samples, our findings suggest that when both sample-wise gradients and residuals transition in an ordered state, this leads to faster convergence and better generalization. Identifying these phase transitions could improve deep learning optimization strategies, enhancing physics-informed methods and overall machine learning performance.

Indexed as

Generalization, PsychologicalLearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansPhase TransitionSignal-To-Noise RatioGeneralizationGradient stochasticityInformation bottleneck theoryPINNs phase transitionResidual homogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40884895
PMCPMC13444385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.