Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884829›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

A Balanced Inversion Polymorphism Exhibits a Dominance Reversal at the Gene Expression Level that Depends on Developmental Context.

Esra Durmaz Mitchell, Envel Kerdaffrec, Paul Schmidt, Thomas Flatt, Sebastian Kittelmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esra Durmaz MitchellDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-2264
Envel KerdaffrecDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8667-6850
Paul SchmidtDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-6705
Thomas FlattDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5990-1503
Sebastian KittelmannCentre for Functional Genomics, School of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-4539

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
European Molecular Biology Organization ALT 248-2018Natural Environment Research Council NBAF1214NIH HHS P40 OD018537Swiss National Science Foundation 310030_219283Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_182262Swiss National Science Foundation FZEB-0-214654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How genetic variance for fitness is maintained is incompletely understood. Mutation-selection balance and single-locus overdominance cannot account for the large variance observed. Recent work suggests that antagonistic balancing selection, favoring different alleles in different contexts and involving beneficial dominance reversals, might contribute to maintaining fitness variance. However, while this mechanism is plausible, evidence for dominance reversals remains scarce. Here, we study how In(3R)Payne, a balanced inversion polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, affects gene expression and chromatin accessibility by using RNA-seq and ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing). We find that, in embryos, the inverted (INV) arrangement tends to have dominant effects, while the standard (STD) arrangement behaves like a recessive Mendelian allele. Yet, in wing discs, this pattern is reversed: STD has mostly dominant effects, whereas INV behaves recessively. Since this shift in the dominance of the INV "allele" between developmental contexts affects the expression of suites of genes in a concerted manner, it might be mediated by a dominance modifier, for example, a transcription factor. In favor of this idea, 25% of the differentially expressed genes between INV and STD encode transcription factors. Interestingly, while only four differentially expressed genes are shared between embryos and wing discs, one of them is HP1c, a chromatin-binding protein and major transcriptional regulator, and thus a promising candidate for mediating the context-dependent change in dominance. Although the relationship between these patterns and fitness is presently unknown, our observations are consistent with a potential role of reversals (or, more generally, shifts) of dominance in maintaining inversion polymorphism.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionDrosophila melanogasterPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsGene Expression Regulation, Developmentalbalancing selectionchromatin accessibilitydominance reversalfitness variancegene expressioninversion polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID40884829
PMCPMC12448880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.