ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
A Balanced Inversion Polymorphism Exhibits a Dominance Reversal at the Gene Expression Level that Depends on Developmental Context.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- De Novo Genome Assemblies of Four Rainbow Trout Genetic Lines Reveal Structural Variants in Pursuit of a Pangenome Reference.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- The geometry of dominance shows broad potential for stable polymorphism under antagonistic pleiotropy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How genetic variance for fitness is maintained is incompletely understood. Mutation-selection balance and single-locus overdominance cannot account for the large variance observed. Recent work suggests that antagonistic balancing selection, favoring different alleles in different contexts and involving beneficial dominance reversals, might contribute to maintaining fitness variance. However, while this mechanism is plausible, evidence for dominance reversals remains scarce. Here, we study how In(3R)Payne, a balanced inversion polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, affects gene expression and chromatin accessibility by using RNA-seq and ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing). We find that, in embryos, the inverted (INV) arrangement tends to have dominant effects, while the standard (STD) arrangement behaves like a recessive Mendelian allele. Yet, in wing discs, this pattern is reversed: STD has mostly dominant effects, whereas INV behaves recessively. Since this shift in the dominance of the INV "allele" between developmental contexts affects the expression of suites of genes in a concerted manner, it might be mediated by a dominance modifier, for example, a transcription factor. In favor of this idea, 25% of the differentially expressed genes between INV and STD encode transcription factors. Interestingly, while only four differentially expressed genes are shared between embryos and wing discs, one of them is HP1c, a chromatin-binding protein and major transcriptional regulator, and thus a promising candidate for mediating the context-dependent change in dominance. Although the relationship between these patterns and fitness is presently unknown, our observations are consistent with a potential role of reversals (or, more generally, shifts) of dominance in maintaining inversion polymorphism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.