SynthesisJAMA cardiology2025
Transcatheter or Surgical Treatment of Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low to Intermediate Risk: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in low risk and younger patients: what evidence is available and what is still missing?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Transcatheter Versus Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Retrospective Patient Cohorts with Aortic Stenosis <75 Years.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Mounting evidence suggests transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as preferred treatment for patients at low to intermediate surgical risk. However, limitations in study design and statistical power raise concerns about the generalizability of individual randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to routine clinical practice. Objective: To compare 1-year outcomes of TAVI vs SAVR in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at low to intermediate surgical risk applying a 2-stage individual participant data (IPD) and aggregate meta-analyses. Data Sources: MEDLINE databases were searched for RCTs comparing TAVI and SAVR in patients with aortic stenosis until June 15, 2025. Study Selection: RCTs were selected comparing TAVI vs SAVR in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk with 1-year follow-up. Data Extraction and Synthesis: IPD were obtained from all investigator-initiated RCTs (DEDICATE, NOTION, NOTION-2, and UK TAVI) and analyzed in 1- and 2-stage IPD meta-analyses. An overall meta-analysis was performed by adding aggregate data from industry-sponsored RCTs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was all-cause death or any stroke 1 year after randomization. Secondary end points included all-cause death, any stroke, disabling stroke, cardiovascular death, rehospitalization for cardiovascular cause, myocardial infarction, new-onset atrial fibrillation, new permanent pacemaker implantation, and aortic valve reintervention. Results: The IPD meta-analysis included 4 RCTs comprising 2873 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.7 [5.5] years; 805 [56.1%] male) at low to intermediate surgical risk randomly assigned to TAVI (n = 1439) or SAVR (n = 1434). At 1 year, the hazard ratio (HR) for the primary end point for TAVI compared to SAVR was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.56-0.95) in the 1-stage and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.49-1.27) in the 2-stage IPD meta-analysis. In the 2-stage overall meta-analysis the HR for the primary end point was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: In this IPD meta-analysis of 4 RCTs, and an overall meta-analysis of 8 RCTs of patients with severe symptomatic AS at low to intermediate risk, TAVI was associated with a reduction in the 1-year incidence of all-cause death or any stroke. These findings emphasize TAVI as alternative option in patients at low to intermediate risk. Long-term follow-up is warranted to evaluate sustainability of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.