Trial reportCirculation2025
Biomarker-Based ABC-AF Risk Scores for Personalized Treatment to Reduce Stroke or Death in Atrial Fibrillation: A Registry-Based, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.
Trial report in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03753490 (ABC-Risk Scores for Reduction of Stroke and Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation - a Multicenter, Registry-based, Randomized Controlled Parallel-group Open-label Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ABC-Risk Scores for Reduction of Stroke and Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation - a Multicenter, Registry-based, Randomized Controlled Parallel-group Open-label Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- NovelBiomedicines · 2026Article
- Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2025: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Comparative performance of stroke risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation with low stroke risk.Open heart · 2026Article
- Associations of metabolic score for insulin resistance and new-onset stroke in middle-aged and older adults: a national cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Early Detection and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: State-of-the-art Review.European cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical use of risk scores to guide treatment decisions and improve clinical outcomes has rarely been prospectively evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether a biomarker-based ABC-AF risk score-guided multidimensional treatment strategy improves long-term outcomes in patients with AF.
methodsThe multicenter, registry-based, randomized, controlled, open-label study enrolled adults with AF. In the ABC-AF strategy arm, the investigator was informed of each individual's ABC-AF score risks for stroke and bleeding, which were used as decision support to tailor treatment recommendations, including preference for type of direct oral anticoagulant treatment. In the standard of care arm, patient management was at the discretion of the investigator. Primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death. Secondary outcomes included stroke, death, major bleeding events, and their composite outcome.
resultsThe intention-to-treat population comprised 3933 patients with a median age of 73.7 years; 33.6% were women, 51.3% had paroxysmal AF, 11.2% had a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, and 85.7% had oral anticoagulant treatment. After randomization, 97.8% in the ABC-AF strategy arm and 92.6% in the standard of care arm received OACs (
conclusionsThe individually tailored multidimensional treatment strategy, based on ABC-AF risk scores, did not improve clinical outcomes compared with usual guideline-based care in patients with AF. The results emphasize the need for prospective testing of the use of risk stratification and precision medicine tools in different clinical settings before implementation in routine care. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03753490.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.