Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884750›Full record

ArticleBioanalysis2025

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and tissue distribution studies in physiological and cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury rats after oral administration of anisodine hydrobromide tablets.

Yujie Yu, Yanfang Liu, Jianlan Zhang, Shu Dai, Rui Wu, Feng Wan, Chenhao Yao, Yuxin Yao, Feng Nan, Yunxia Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yujie YuState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yanfang LiuState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jianlan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Shu DaiState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Rui WuState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Feng WanState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chenhao YaoState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yuxin YaoState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Feng NanThe Department of National Drug Clinical Trial Agency, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yunxia LiState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, Key Laboratory of Standardization for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe aim to establish a rapid and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method to analyze the pharmacokinetics of oral anisodine hydrobromide (AH) tablets.

methodsComparison of pharmacokinetic differences between AH (present in vivo as anisodine) and its metabolite NOAT3 in two groups of rats after administration of AH at doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg. In addition, plasma concentrations of AH were used as a pharmacokinetic parameter, and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) were selected as pharmacodynamic indicators to establish a pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) combined model in physiological and CIRI model rats, to analyze the protective effect of AH against CIRI. RESULTS &

conclusionThe study demonstrated that AH could be rapidly and extensively distributed to various tissues in rats. AH is a promising drug for the treatment of rat models of CIRI.

Indexed as

Administration, OralPharmacokineticsTissue DistributionAnimalsBrain IschemiaChromatography, High Pressure LiquidMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyScopolamine DerivativesTabletsanisodineScopolamine DerivativesTabletsAnisodine hydrobromidecerebral ischemia-reperfusion injuryneuroprotective effectpharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic combined modelpharmacokineticstissue distributionUPLC-MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID40884750
PMCPMC12536769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.