ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025
Association of Eliminating Waiting Periods for the Children's Health Insurance Program with Children's Enrollment.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrior to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), over two-thirds of states mandated that children had to be uninsured for set periods of time before enrolling in the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), referred to as waiting periods. The ACA required that waiting periods could not exceed 90 days, leading states to reduce and eliminate waiting periods in response. This study aimed to examine the association between state waiting period elimination under the ACA with children's enrollment in CHIP.
methodsWe used 2010-2019 annual state enrollment data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to calculate the proportion of children enrolled in CHIP among 20 states that eliminated waiting periods compared to 14 who maintained them. We estimated difference-in-difference models to assess the association between waiting period elimination with children's CHIP enrollment.
resultsIn states that eliminated waiting periods, there were significant increases from 10.86% (95% CI: 9.51-12.21) of children enrolled in CHIP in the pre-policy period to 13.43% (95% CI: 12.21-14.66) after the ACA policy change. In adjusted difference-in-difference models, state waiting period elimination was associated with a 1.75% point (95% CI: 0.43-3.11) increase in children's enrollment in CHIP relative to states that maintained waiting periods, representing a 16% enrollment increase from pre-policy baseline levels.
conclusionsWaiting period elimination under the ACA led to modest but significant increases in CHIP enrollment among children. Our results suggest potential CHIP enrollment benefits from the elimination of waiting periods that were maintained in 9 states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.