ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Chromoanagenesis in Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Overview.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optical genome mapping improves detection and characterisation of cytogenetic abnormalities in non-Hodgkin lymphomas.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromoanagenesis, which includes chromothripsis, chromoplexy, and chromoanasynthesis, plays a significant role in cancer development, including multiple myeloma (MM). This process involves massive chromosomal rearrangements occurring during a single cellular event, leading to the shattering and random reassembly of chromosomes. In MM, a malignancy of plasma cells, chromothripsis has been associated with poor prognosis and aggressive disease progression, whereas chromoplexy has not shown the same correlation. The concept of chromoanasynthesis has not been explicitly introduced in MM and is most likely encompassed within the chromothripsis category. Recent studies suggest that chromothripsis may act as a driver event in MM and could predict disease evolution from an asymptomatic precursor state to symptomatic disease. In MM, as in other cancers, the technique for the detection of complex events is crucial to determine their true prevalence and to establish a differential diagnosis between chromothripsis, chromoplexy, and chromoanasynthesis, with whole genome sequencing being the gold standard for evaluating the standard Korbel and Campbell criteria. More affordable alternative techniques, such as optical genome mapping and long-read sequencing, have emerged. In this mini-review, we discuss, among other topics, the history of detection and analysis of complex genomic alterations in MM, highlighting the successive deviations that have led to a laxity in definitions since Korbel and Campbell, resulting in the loss of important information. It is essential to establish clear and consensus-based criteria for defining the various chromoanagenesis to enable more precise investigations in MM. Finally, understanding the role of chromothripsis, MM could offer new insights into the disease's pathogenesis and provide novel therapeutic targets. Approaches targeting the repair of chromothriptic damage or exploiting the vulnerability of cells with chromothripsis-induced genomic instability could potentially improve outcomes for patients with MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40884654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.