ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Pulmonary arterial blowout syndrome as a serious adverse event in patients with advanced lung cancer: a 12-year retrospective study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMassive haemoptysis due to central pulmonary artery (CPA) rupture in patients with advanced lung cancer is a fatal complication with limited early diagnostic tools. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with pulmonary artery rupture and to propose a grading model to facilitate early diagnosis and timely endovascular intervention. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with advanced lung cancer who experienced in-hospital sudden haemoptysis-related death and received endovascular treatment for CPA abnormalities. Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:2) balanced covariates between haemoptysis-related and other in-hospital deaths. Following PSM, multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors. Patients were categorised into two cohorts: Group A (2012-2018) and Group B (2019-2024), the latter reflecting the implementation of early detection and endovascular management. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing.
resultsAmong 886 in-hospital deaths, sudden haemoptysis accounted for 4.63% (41/886), with 90.24% (37/41) exhibiting CPA abnormalities. CPA abnormalities, tumour necrosis, cavitation, and progressive bloody or malodorous sputum were identified as significant risk factors (p < 0.05). The haemoptysis group had significantly shorter OS than controls (p < 0.001). A three-tier grading system for pulmonary arterial blowout syndrome (PABS) was developed, with acute PABS being the most prevalent (67.26%). Patients in Group B demonstrated significantly improved OS compared with Group A (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe PABS grading model enables risk stratification of life-threatening haemoptysis secondary to CPA rupture. Early identification and endovascular intervention may significantly improve clinical outcomes in advanced lung cancer. KEY POINTS: Question What are the clinical characteristics and risk stratification criteria for life-threatening haemoptysis arising from CPA rupture in advanced lung cancer? Findings In-hospital sudden haemoptysis mortality was 4.63% and strongly associated with CPA abnormalities. A PABS grading model characterises this fatal condition. Clinical relevance The PABS grading system enables early recognition of high-risk CPA rupture in advanced lung cancer. Prompt identification and endovascular intervention may substantially improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40884610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.