ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2025
In vivo responses of β-tricalcium phosphate-based paste-like artificial bone with antibacterial properties under potentially infectious conditions using a rabbit model.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium-phosphate cement (CPC), a paste-like artificial bone, is a material form that allows minimally invasive treatment. However, CPC is not infection resistant, which may lead to surgical site infections. We recently developed a paste-like organic/inorganic hybrid artificial bone that is compatible with the bone remodeling cycle. In this study, we added silver-loaded tricalcium phosphate, which has antibacterial properties, to the hybrid CPC and fabricated a prototype "antibacterial CPC". Antibacterial and non-antibacterial CPCs were implanted into a rabbit jaw defect model in which infection could occur, and the in vivo responses were compared. In cement specimens retrieved from rabbit jaws, residual material was observed with the non-antibacterial CPC, whereas with the antibacterial CPC, almost all of the material was resorbed and replaced with host bone. These results suggest that placement of antibacterial CPC in a rabbit jaw bone defect model susceptible to bacterial infection promotes material resorption and bone formation. The antibacterial CPC developed in this study is thus a novel paste artificial bone exhibiting good bioresorption and osteogenic potential in biological hard tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.