Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884586›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Factors impacting informed decision-making for patients with pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study.

Patrick L Quinn, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Jennifer Eramo, Sadie Chen, Jordan M Cloyd, Laura J Rush, Aslam Ejaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expanding perspectives on informed decision-making in pancreatic cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick L QuinnThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ann Scheck McAlearneyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jennifer EramoThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sadie ChenThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jordan M CloydThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Laura J RushThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aslam EjazUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. aejaz@uic.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInformed decision-making is an essential component of shared decision-making between patients and their cancer teams that promotes patient comprehension of their disease and available treatment options. The complex nature of multidisciplinary treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) presents unique challenges for informed decision-making, for which barriers and facilitators are poorly understood.

methodsIn this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with PC patients seeking treatment at a Midwestern, high-volume, academic medical center to examine various aspects of informed decision-making, including patients' understanding of treatment options, challenges in obtaining information, and how a decision aid may improve decision-making. Purposive sampling was used for recruitment and continued until thematic saturation was achieved. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded by the research team. Qualitative analysis was completed using an integrative approach involving both inductive and deductive methods.

resultsAcross 20 PC patients interviewed, the median age was 67 years, with 30% having metastatic disease (n = 6). Most patients reported having a knowledge gap about PC treatment options, requiring them to explore multiple resources to support their treatment decision-making. Furthermore, most interviewees noted that additional information in the form of a decision aid could be helpful in their decision-making process, particularly in understanding the advantages and disadvantages of treatment options, but also in introducing supportive care resources and improving their understanding of palliative care. However, concerns regarding the potential for providing too much information at once were common and perceived as potentially overwhelming.

conclusionsThis qualitative study highlights the challenges that PC patients face in making informed treatment decisions and, therefore, in engaging in shared decision-making. Further research on patient-centered strategies, such as decision aids, is needed to improve the quality of both shared and informed decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Making, SharedPancreatic NeoplasmsPatient ParticipationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchInformed decision-makingPancreatic cancerQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40884586
PMCPMC12398429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.