ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Indications for Blood Cultures in Dogs and Associations With Positive Results in 323 Submissions.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Case of Sepsis Caused by ST80 Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcus faecium With Concurrent Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in a Dog.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Bacterial Sampling Collection for Veterinary Microbiology in Companion Animals.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Indications for Blood Cultures in Dogs and Associations With Positive Results in 323 Submissions.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacteremia has been associated with many diseases in dogs, but contemporary data from a large and diverse population are lacking. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesReport reasons for blood culture, protocols used, and diseases associated with a positive result in a tertiary referral institution. We hypothesized that larger volumes of blood, lack of previous antimicrobial administration, and changes in hematologic variables would be associated with increased rates of microbiological growth. ANIMALS: A total of 279 dogs from which 323 blood culture results were available.
methodsFor 180 submissions, patient and blood culture protocol data at the time of specimen collection were collected prospectively using a survey form. For 143 submissions, data were retrospectively collected.
resultsMicrobial growth was noted in 55/323 (17%) submissions, with 35/55 (63.6%) interpreted as clinically relevant growth and 20 (36.4%) interpreted as contamination, resulting in an overall positive rate of 10.8%. Specimen volume (p = 0.01), white blood cell count (p < 0.001), and neutrophil count (p = 0.001) were positively associated with relevant growth. Diseases associated with relevant growth were suspected discospondylitis (30%, p = 0.05) and illness while on immunosuppressive drugs (44%, p = 0.004). Submissions performed to assess for bacteremia as a secondary cause of immune-mediated disease were less likely to yield relevant growth (0%, p = 0.004) than those performed for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this population, blood cultures were most likely to provide diagnostically useful information in dogs with suspected discospondylitis and those receiving immunosuppressive drugs. Specimen volume should be maximized to increase the likelihood of clinically relevant growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.