Observational studyJAMA cardiology2025
Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of New-Onset Myocarditis and Pericarditis.
Observational study in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Evidence for a Putative B Cell-Cholate Immunometabolic Axis in Pericarditis: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Is clonal haematopoiesis the missing link between lupus and cardiovascular disease?Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with cancer and cancer survivors: From clonal burden to cardiovascular diseases.Cancer · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of Incident Pericarditis and Myocarditis in 2 US Biobank Cohorts.JAMA cardiology · 2026Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis in Cardiovascular Risk: Focus on Inflammatory Mechanisms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP) in Pulmonary Embolism and CTEPH: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Rationale and design of the Pre-MYO project: a precision-medicine platform for myocarditis diagnosis and management.ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential and Cardiometabolic Disease: Challenges, Controversies and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is the age-related clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells with leukemia-associated mutations. Certain CHIP mutations promote atherosclerosis and heart failure through immune-related pathways. Objective: To test whether CHIP is associated with the development of myocarditis and pericarditis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational population-based cohort study used data from the UK Biobank. Enrollment occurred between 2006 and 2010. Participants with whole-exome sequencing, no prevalent cardiovascular disease or hematological malignancy, and complete covariate data were included. Follow-up occurred for a median of 13.6 (IQR, 12.8-14.2) years. Analyses were conducted from November 2024 to July 2025. Exposures: Any CHIP (variant allele frequency [VAF] ≥2%) and large CHIP (VAF ≥10%) constituted coprimary study exposures. Secondary analyses considered DNMT3A and TET2 CHIP as separate exposures. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of incident myocarditis and pericarditis. Cox regression tested associations of CHIP with myocarditis and pericarditis, adjusting for age, sex, race and ancestry, and cardiovascular risk factors. Secondary analyses considered myocarditis and pericarditis as separate outcomes. Additional analyses compared associations of CHIP with myocarditis and pericarditis with those with other cardiovascular diseases, and tested the bidirectional associations between CHIP and noncardiac immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Results: Among 335 426 participants (mean age, 56.1 years; 185 429 female [55.3%] and 149 997 male [44.7%]), 11 057 had any CHIP (3.3%), 7271 had large CHIP (2.2%), and 382 developed myocarditis or pericarditis (0.11%). Any and large CHIP were associated with multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.14-2.68; P = .01) and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.28-3.33; P = .003), respectively, for the primary composite outcome of incident myocarditis and pericarditis. Increased risks were observed for DNMT3A and TET2 CHIP, with hazard ratios of 2.22 (95% CI, 1.17-4.21; P = .01) for DNMT3A with pericarditis and 3.65 (95% CI, 1.16-11.49; P = .03) for TET2 with myocarditis. CHIP associated with myocarditis and pericarditis more strongly than with other cardiovascular diseases (eg, coronary artery disease and heart failure). Any CHIP was also associated with 1.27-fold risk (95% CI, 1.16-1.39; P < .001) of developing noncardiac immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, without evidence for reverse causation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, CHIP was a strong risk factor for myocarditis and pericarditis among middle-aged adults. Targeting CHIP and its downstream pathways may represent a strategy for preventing or treating pericarditis and myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.